2018 Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Huanggang Yadong | mg/m³ | 34.8 | 57.1 | 9.8 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Hubei Yadong | mg/m³ | 30 | 20 | 28 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m³ | 53 | 83.2 | 66.5 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m³ | 30 | 7 | 3 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Sichuan Yadong | mg/m³ | 125 | 16.5 | 11.3 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of SO₂ - Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m³ | 236 | 192 | 70 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Huanggang Yadong | mg/m³ | 387 | 315 | 324 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Hubei Yadong | mg/m³ | 315 | 324 | 319 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m³ | 311 | 308.4 | 276 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m³ | 297 | 136 | 33 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Sichuan Yadong | mg/m³ | 302 | 291 | 340 | 24 |
| Annual average concentration of nitrogen oxides - Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m³ | 270 | 272 | 293 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Huanggang Yadong | mg/m³ | 12.31 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Hubei Yadong | mg/m³ | 5.2 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m³ | 14.3 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Nanchang Yadong (cement grinding) | mg/m³ | 9.2 | 8.2 | 9.7 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m³ | 2 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Sichuan Yadong | mg/m³ | 3 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Wuhan Yadong (cement grinding) | mg/m³ | 15.6 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m³ | 6.9 | 24 | ||
| Average concentration of particles (dust) - Yangzhou Yadong (cement grinding) | mg/m³ | 10 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Huanggang Yadong | mg/m³ | 17.6 | 15.25 | 8.38 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Hubei Yadong | mg/m³ | 14 | 13 | 8.6 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m³ | 10.7 | 9.1 | 16.9 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m³ | 13.3 | 9 | 8 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Sichuan Yadong | mg/m³ | 8.8 | 17.3 | 3.34 | 24 |
| Average concentration of particles (soot) - Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m³ | 14 | 7.43 | 4.65 | 24 |
| Denitrification operation expense (Huanggang Yadong) | RMB | 2148000 | 25 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense (Hubei Yadong) | RMB | 5170000 | 25 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense (Jiangxi Yadong) | RMB | 19980284 | 25 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense (Sichuan Lafeng) | RMB | 5695000 | 25 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense (Sichuan Yadong) | RMB | 5929263 | 25 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense (Wuhan Yaxin) | RMB | 11598 | 25 | ||
| Desulfurization operation expense (Hubei Yadong) | RMB | 2410000 | 25 | ||
| Desulfurization operation expense (Jiangxi Yadong) | RMB | 9189282 | 25 | ||
| Desulfurization operation expense (Wuhan Yaxin) | RMB | 66000 | 25 | ||
| Nitrogen oxide emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 985 | 688.6 | 613.6 | 23 |
| Nitrogen oxide emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 1301 | 1171 | 1064 | 23 |
| Nitrogen oxide emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 4617 | 4624 | 5447 | 23 |
| Nitrogen oxide emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 1294 | 1662 | 953 | 23 |
| Nitrogen oxide emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 2460 | 1927 | 1073 | 23 |
| Nitrogen oxide emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 504.5 | 489.6 | 453.8 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 29.1 | 27.6 | 39.3 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 163 | 183.6 | 90 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 261 | 244 | 257 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 150.7 | 172 | 81 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 239.4 | 160.4 | 71.4 | 23 |
| Particulate pollutant emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 55.4 | 51.8 | 21.9 | 23 |
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Chengdu Yali, water spray devices) | RMB | 14000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Huanggang Yadong) | RMB | 1764716 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Huanggang Yadong, other measures) | RMB | 150000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Hubei Yadong) | RMB | 2801692 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Jiangxi Yadong) | RMB | 8174745 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Nanchang Yadong) | RMB | 100000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Nanchang Yadong, anti-dust fog cannons) | RMB | 8652 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Nanchang Yadong, environmental monitoring devices) | RMB | 9520 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Nanchang Yadong, stockyard dust proof nets) | RMB | 10414 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Shifang Yadong) | RMB | 68982 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Sichuan Lafeng) | RMB | 2316069 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Sichuan Lafeng, insulation barriers and mufflers) | RMB | 700000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Sichuan Yadong) | RMB | 3115950 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Sichuan Yali, spraying system at entrance) | RMB | 4200 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yadong, car washing platform) | RMB | 26000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yadong, underground sewage processes) | RMB | 20000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yaxin) | RMB | 1163000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yaxin, dust collectors in cement packaging workshop) | RMB | 350000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yaxin, other measures) | RMB | 40000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Wuhan Yaxin, sealing factory and vehicle assembling system) | RMB | 180000 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Yangzhou Yadong) | RMB | 22006 | 25 | ||
| Pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (Yangzhou Yadong, sewage in production) | RMB | 5000 | 25 | ||
| Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Hubei Yadong) | 1 | 25 | |||
| Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Wuhan Yadong) | 1 | 25 | |||
| Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Yangzhou Yadong) | 2 | 25 | |||
| Total denitrification operation expense | RMB | 40034145 | 25 | ||
| Total pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government | RMB | 19527160 | 25 | ||
| Total pollutants discharge fee paid and environmental protection tax to the government (other measures) | RMB | 1603466 | 25 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) in Asia Cement (China) | 0.899 | 0.859 | 0.884 | 18 | |
| CO2 emission intensity | 0.884 | 7 | |||
| CO2 spared from emission (clinker saving) | tons | 198000 | 7 | ||
| Emission intensity of CO2, Huanggang Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.932 | 0.865 | 0.904 | 17, 18 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Hubei Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.922 | 0.944 | 0.958 | 17, 18 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.856 | 0.858 | 0.864 | 17, 18 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng | tCO2/t clinker | 0.909 | 0.875 | 0.871 | 17, 18 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Sichuan Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.907 | 0.873 | 0.875 | 17, 18 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Wuhan Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.936 | 0.938 | 0.909 | 17 |
| Emission intensity of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin | 0.936 | 0.841 | 0.938 | 18 | |
| GHG emission intensity | 0.9 | 7 | |||
| SO2 emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 84.6 | 105.6 | 43 | 23 |
| SO2 emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 338.4 | 131.8 | 88 | 23 |
| SO2 emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 726 | 1182 | 1368 | 23 |
| SO2 emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 135.9 | 85 | 53 | 23 |
| SO2 emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 111.5 | 89.6 | 49.1 | 23 |
| SO2 emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 49 | 10 | 19.6 | 23 |
| Total emission of CO2, Asia Cement (China) | 10000 tons | 2185.4 | 2076.8 | 2192.5 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Huanggang Yadong | 10000 tons | 149.9 | 141.7 | 151.2 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong | 10000 tons | 302.7 | 290.9 | 315.9 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong | 10000 tons | 1001.1 | 1000.6 | 1014.5 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng | 10000 tons | 242.7 | 241.1 | 269.4 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong | 10000 tons | 398 | 325.4 | 361.6 | 18 |
| Total emission of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 91 | 77.1 | 79.9 | 18 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subtotal waste disposal | ton | 13669 | 13364 | 12017 | 27 |
| Waste lubricating oil and engine oil disposal | ton | 358 | 162 | 344 | 27 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 107599 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 65842 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 394643 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 237906 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 118875 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 119543 | 27 | ||
| Desulfurization gypsum utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 69898 | 27 | ||
| Electric furnace slag utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 42358 | 27 | ||
| Electric furnace slag utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 132040 | 27 | ||
| Electric furnace slag utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 76318 | 27 | ||
| Electric furnace slag utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 8472 | 27 | ||
| Electric furnace slag utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 27298 | 27 | ||
| Household wastes disposal | ton | 1440 | 1512 | 1365 | 27 |
| Industrial slag utilized | million tons | 6.15 | 7 | ||
| Others utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 5613 | 27 | ||
| Others utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 34537 | 27 | ||
| Others utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 196805 | 27 | ||
| Tailings utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 73123 | 27 | ||
| Tailings utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 641868 | 27 | ||
| Tailings utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 10066 | 27 | ||
| Waste soil, gravel, waste concrete, and test blocks disposal | ton | 8934 | 7931 | 2179 | 27 |
| Wastes disposal total | tons | 12017 | 7 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 emission reduction from electricity saving, Asia Cement (China) | tons | 7000 | 18 |
| CO2 emissions reduced by electricity saving | tons | 7000 | 7 |
| Clinker consumption CO2 reduction, Asia Cement (China) | tons | 198000 | 18 |
| Investment in pollution control and prevention | million RMB | 140 | 7 |
| Total CO2 reduction, Asia Cement (China) | tons | 205000 | 18 |
| Total carbon reduction | tons CO2 | 205000 | 7 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement kilns coordinate waste disposal (domestic sludge) | ton | 1200 | 5268 | 27 | |
| Coal slag utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 59446 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 19188 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 134071 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 59440 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 19102 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 12060 | 27 | ||
| Coal slag utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 88888 | 27 | ||
| Construction waste utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 49845 | 27 | ||
| Construction waste utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 26977 | 27 | ||
| Converter slag utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 15451 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 45004 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 356614 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 95403 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 86476 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 23242 | 27 | ||
| Fly-ash utilization volume by Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 98735 | 27 | ||
| Non-ferrous metal slag utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 52066 | 27 | ||
| Non-ferrous metal slag utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 2935 | 27 | ||
| Non-ferrous metal slag utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 21880 | 27 | ||
| Non-ferrous metal slag utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 36931 | 27 | ||
| Non-ferrous metal slag utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 60688 | 27 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Huanggang Yadong) | RMB | 2930000 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Hubei Yadong) | RMB | 4400000 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Jiangxi Yadong) | RMB | 28340474 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Nanchang Yadong) | RMB | 3980000 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Shifang Yadong) | RMB | 511432 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Sichuan Lafeng) | RMB | 1827000 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Sichuan Yadong) | RMB | 21669796 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Wuhan Yaxin) | RMB | 520467 | 25 | ||
| Operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices (Yangzhou Yadong) | RMB | 296217 | 25 | ||
| Others (waste wood) disposal | ton | 0.06 | 14 | 35.6 | 27 |
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 16938 | 27 | ||
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 24428 | 27 | ||
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 7174 | 27 | ||
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 160822 | 27 | ||
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 205559 | 27 | ||
| Phosphogypsum utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 4167 | 27 | ||
| Refractory bricks disposal | ton | 170 | 572 | 477 | 27 |
| Sulfate slag utilization volume by Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 74889 | 27 | ||
| Sulfate slag utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 99042 | 27 | ||
| Total operation expense for big bag dust collectors, bag collectors and static dust-eliminating devices | RMB | 65114386 | 25 | ||
| Waste belts and tires disposal | ton | 171 | 588 | 58.2 | 27 |
| Waste cable and batteries disposal | ton | 0.6 | 4 | 9.8 | 27 |
| Waste chemical test solution disposal | ton | 2.2 | 4 | 4.2 | 27 |
| Waste metal disposal | ton | 2586 | 2572 | 2270 | 27 |
| Waste paper disposal | ton | 5 | 5 | 6.2 | 27 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinker output, Asia Cement (China) | 10000 tons | 2431.4 | 2416.6 | 2480 | 18 |
| Clinker output, Huanggang Yadong | 000 tons, 10000 tons | 160.8 | 163.8 | 1000 | 17, 18 |
| Clinker output, Hubei Yadong | 000 tons, 10000 tons | 900 | 344.6 | 329.8 | 17, 18 |
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong | 000 tons, 10000 tons | 1139.4 | 1200 | 1200 | 17, 18 |
| Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng | 000 tons, 10000 tons | 800 | 275.4 | 800 | 17, 18 |
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong | 000 tons, 10000 tons | 483.6 | 900 | 413.1 | 17, 18 |
| Clinker output, Wuhan Yadong | 000 tons | 800 | 800 | 800 | 17 |
| Clinker output, Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 97.2 | 91.7 | 85.2 | 18 |
| Electricity consumption reduction, Asia Cement (China) | MWh | 8960 | 18 | ||
| Electricity generated from residual heat recovery | MWh | 636198 | 7 | ||
| Energy consumption of cement (MCAL/ton) | MCAL/ton | 644.23 | 661.45 | 658.81 | 19 |
| Energy density (GJ/ton cement) | GJ/ton cement | 2.7 | 2.77 | 2.76 | 19 |
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 91951 | 27 | ||
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 735121 | 27 | ||
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 176092 | 27 | ||
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 744046 | 27 | ||
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 66925 | 27 | ||
| Limestone powder utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 72126 | 27 | ||
| Proportion of residual heat power generation | % | 29.55 | 7 | ||
| Proportion of waste heat power generation (Asia Cement China, 2018) | % | 29.55 | 19 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subtotal utilization volume by Huanggang Yadong | ton | 494013 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Hubei Yadong | ton | 1535549 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 1340258 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Nanchang Yadong | ton | 180767 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 339637 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Sichuan Yadong | ton | 695244 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Wuhan Yadong | ton | 324409 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 862509 | 27 |
| Subtotal utilization volume by Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 379958 | 27 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity saved | million KWh | 8.96 | 7 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Huanggang Yadong | 10000 tons | 37.2 | 41 | 49.4 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Hubei Yadong | 10000 tons | 184.7 | 187.9 | 153.5 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Jiangxi Yadong | 10000 tons | 126.2 | 136.2 | 134 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Nanchang Yadong | 10000 tons | 17.8 | 17.2 | 18.1 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | 10000 tons | 44.7 | 34 | 45 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Sichuan Yadong | 10000 tons | 57.3 | 61.1 | 69.5 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Wuhan Yadong | 10000 tons | 48.7 | 37.9 | 32.4 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 68.2 | 77 | 86.3 | 26 |
| Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag - Yangzhou Yadong | 10000 tons | 47.4 | 45.6 | 38 | 26 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment in green mines | million RMB | 48.16 | 7 |
| Mined-final-wall length reclaimed | meters | 6000 | 7 |
| Reclaimed mines area | hectares | 35.65 | 7 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender trend for long-term borrowed workers - Female | persons | 91 | 81 | 63 | 58 | 48 |
| Gender trend for long-term borrowed workers - Male | persons | 303 | 296 | 255 | 210 | 48 |
| Gender trend for official employees - Female | persons | 527 | 501 | 495 | 483 | 48 |
| Gender trend for official employees - Male | persons | 3971 | 3703 | 3444 | 3404 | 48 |
| Local employees - All companies | employees | 2842 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 38 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 220 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 284 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 85 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 732 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 83 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 30 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 40 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Shanghai Yali | employees | 6 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 339 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 395 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 31 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 82 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 27 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 30 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 43 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 266 | 13 | |||
| Local employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 101 | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - All companies | percent | 73% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Chengdu Yali | percent | 97% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Huanggang Yadong | percent | 76% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Hubei Yadong | percent | 67% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Hubei Yali | percent | 93% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Jiangxi Yadong | percent | 74% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Jiangxi Yali | percent | 67% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Nanchang Yadong | percent | 59% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Nanchang Yali | percent | 40% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Shanghai Yali | percent | 38% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Lanfeng | percent | 81% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yadong | percent | 68% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yali | percent | 65% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | percent | 98% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Taizhou Yadong | percent | 82% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yadong | percent | 36% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yali | percent | 74% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yaxin | percent | 92% | 13 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Yangzhou Yadong | percent | 61% | 13 | |||
| Local employees proportion | % | 73 | 7 | |||
| New staff | persons | 361 | 48 | |||
| Participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan - Number of employees | 33 | 53 | ||||
| Remuneration increase for employees | % | 10.36 | 7 | |||
| Return on equity rights and interests | 3.0% | 1.6% | 6.4% | 22.1% | 41 | |
| TWI - Number of employees | 139 | 53 | ||||
| Total employees - All companies | employees | 3887 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 39 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 286 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 400 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 91 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 1028 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 123 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 50 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 109 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Shanghai Yali | employees | 16 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 417 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 568 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 48 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 84 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 31 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 81 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 58 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 288 | 13 | |||
| Total employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 164 | 13 | |||
| Total man-hour costs of the Company | 0.000RMB | 148 | 53 | |||
| Total working hours - Chengdu Yali | hours | 405600 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Huanggang Yadong | hours | 760320 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Hubei Yadong | hours | 1124640 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Hubei Yali | hours | 256800 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Jiangxi Yadong | hours | 2616240 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Jiangxi Yali | hours | 324000 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Nanchang Yadong | hours | 129360 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Nanchang Yali | hours | 287760 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Lanfeng | hours | 1166400 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Yadong | hours | 1525920 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Yali | hours | 126720 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Taihou Yadong | hours | 89760 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yadong | hours | 20328 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yali | hours | 129360 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yaxin | hours | 778800 | 56 | |||
| Total working hours - Yangzhou Yadong | hours | 456000 | 56 | |||
| Yangzhou Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 7 | 53 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huanggang Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 17 | 53 | |
| Resigned staff | persons | 403 | 48 | |
| Turnover rate | percent | 11% | 48 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR (Frequency rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 6.86 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Sichuan Yadong | 3.27 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Sichuan Yali | 7.89 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Wuhan Yadong | 98.39 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Wuhan Yaxin | 5.14 | 56 | |
| Nanchang Yadong FR (Frequency Rate) Male (Contractors) | 14.03 | 58 | |
| Nanchang Yadong FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male (Contractors) | 2.59 | 58 | |
| Nanchang Yadong SR (Severity Rate) Male (Contractors) | 477 | 58 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Huanggang Yadong | 2 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Hubei Yadong | 3 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Jiangxi Yadong | 2 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Jiangxi Yali | 1 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Lanfeng | 8 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Yadong | 6 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Yali | 2 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Wuhan Yadong | 2 | 56 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Wuhan Yaxin | 5 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 21 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Hubei Yadong | 221 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 89 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Jiangxi Yali | 16 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 271 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Sichuan Yadong | 91 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Sichuan Yali | 237 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Wuhan Yadong | 95 | 56 | |
| SR (Severity rate) - Wuhan Yaxin | 256 | 56 | |
| Sichuan Yali FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 47.3 | 58 | |
| Sichuan Yali FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 0.33 | 58 | |
| Sichuan Yali SR (Severity Rate) Male | 24 | 58 | |
| Total - FR (Frequency rate) | 3.09 | 56 | |
| Total - FSI (Frequency severity index) | 0.57 | 56 | |
| Total - Ordinary occupational disasters | 31 | 56 | |
| Wuhan Yaxin FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 5.26 | 58 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia Cement (China) Total AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.57 | 58 |
| Asia Cement (China) Total FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 3.44 | 58 | |
| Asia Cement (China) Total FR (Frequency Rate) Male (Contractors) | 0.31 | 58 | |
| Asia Cement (China) Total FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 0.63 | 58 | |
| Asia Cement (China) Total FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male (Contractors) | 0.02 | 58 | |
| Asia Cement (China) Total SR (Severity Rate) Male | 116 | 58 | |
| Asia Cement (China) Total SR (Severity Rate) Male (Contractors) | 5 | 58 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 2.63 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Hubei Yadong | 2.67 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 2.68 | 56 | |
| FR (Frequency rate) - Jiangxi Yali | 3.1 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Huanggang Yadong | 0.24 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Hubei Yadong | 0.77 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Jiangxi Yadong | 0.49 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Jiangxi Yali | 0.22 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 0.97 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Sichuan Yadong | 0.19 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Sichuan Yali | 1.37 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Wuhan Yadong | 0.97 | 56 | |
| FSI (Frequency severity index) - Wuhan Yaxin | 1.15 | 56 | |
| Huanggang Yadong AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.02 | 58 |
| Huanggang Yadong FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 2.87 | 58 | |
| Huanggang Yadong FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 0.56 | 58 | |
| Huanggang Yadong SR (Severity Rate) Male | 23 | 58 | |
| Hubei Yadong FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 3.09 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yadong AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.08 | 58 |
| Jiangxi Yadong FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 3.6 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yadong FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 0.54 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yadong SR (Severity Rate) Male | 99 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yali AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.01 | 58 |
| Jiangxi Yali FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 3.27 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yali FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 0.23 | 58 | |
| Jiangxi Yali SR (Severity Rate) Male | 16 | 58 | |
| Sichuan Lanfeng AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.27 | 58 |
| Sichuan Lanfeng FR (Frequency Rate) Male | 4.54 | 58 | |
| Sichuan Lanfeng FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 1.54 | 58 | |
| Sichuan Lanfeng SR (Severity Rate) Male | 340 | 58 | |
| Total - SR (Severity rate) | 105 | 56 | |
| Total - Total working hours | hours | 10033488 | 56 |
| Wuhan Yaxin AR (Absence Rate) Male | % | 0.09 | 58 |
| Wuhan Yaxin FSI (Frequency-Severity Index) Male | 1.4 | 58 | |
| Wuhan Yaxin SR (Severity Rate) Male | 11 | 58 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangxi Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 20 | 53 |
| Jiangxi Yali - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Number of sessions for settlement of production disputes between plants and mines | sessions | 25 | 14 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elite class training - Echelon Completed | 1 | 53 | |
| Elite class training - Number of employees | 8 | 53 | |
| Employee satisfaction | % | 64.04 | 7 |
| Huanggang Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 24 | 53 |
| Huanggang Yadong - Training fees | 0.000RMB | 7 | 53 |
| Industry 4.0 & AI intelligence course - Echelon Completed | 8 | 53 | |
| Industry 4.0 & AI intelligence course - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 43 | 53 |
| Industry 4.0 & AI intelligence course - Number of employees | 325 | 53 | |
| New comers training - Echelon Completed | 2 | 53 | |
| New comers training - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 12 | 53 |
| New comers training - Number of employees | 173 | 53 | |
| Participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan - Echelon Completed | 5 | 53 | |
| Participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 20 | 53 |
| TTT & OJT - Echelon Completed | 3 | 53 | |
| TTT & OJT - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 20 | 53 |
| TTT & OJT - Number of employees | 133 | 53 | |
| TWI - Echelon Completed | 3 | 53 | |
| TWI - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 11 | 53 |
| Total major project-oriented trainings - Echelon Completed | 25 | 53 | |
| Total major project-oriented trainings - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 258 | 53 |
| Total major project-oriented trainings - Number of employees | 1098 | 53 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average training hours per person | hours | 17 | 53 |
| Chengdu Yali - Training hours | hours | 174 | 53 |
| Elite class training - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 8 | 53 |
| Elite class training - Total length of time | day | 11 | 53 |
| Huanggang Yadong - Training hours | hours | 7656 | 53 |
| Hubei Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 27 | 53 |
| Hubei Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 27 | 53 |
| Hubei Yadong - Training hours | hours | 1206 | 53 |
| Hubei Yali - Training hours | hours | 174 | 53 |
| Industry 4.0 & AI intelligence course - Total length of time | day | 16 | 53 |
| Investment in training system | million RMB | 4.23 | 7 |
| Jiangxi Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 283 | 53 |
| Jiangxi Yadong - Training fees | 0.000RMB | 262 | 53 |
| Jiangxi Yadong - Training hours | hours | 9222 | 53 |
| Jiangxi Yali - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Jiangxi Yali - Training hours | hours | 1566 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 4 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yadong - Training fees | 0.000RMB | 1 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yadong - Training hours | hours | 1392 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yali - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 11 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yali - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 12 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yali - Training fees | 0.000RMB | 1 | 53 |
| Nanchang Yali - Training hours | hours | 5046 | 53 |
| New comers training - Total length of time | day | 10 | 53 |
| Participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan - Total length of time | day | 22 | 53 |
| Sichuan Lafeng - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 11 | 53 |
| Sichuan Lafeng - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 11 | 53 |
| Sichuan Lafeng - Training hours | hours | 5046 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 23 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 24 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yadong - Training fees | 0.000RMB | 1 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yadong - Training hours | hours | 10440 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yali - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 1 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yali - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 1 | 53 |
| Sichuan Yali - Training hours | hours | 522 | 53 |
| TTT & OJT - Total length of time | day | 13 | 53 |
| TWI - Total length of time | day | 9 | 53 |
| Taizhou Yadong - Training hours | hours | 1044 | 53 |
| Team execution and QCC training - Echelon Completed | 3 | 53 | |
| Team execution and QCC training - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 19 | 53 |
| Team execution and QCC training - Number of employees | 287 | 53 | |
| Team execution and QCC training - Total length of time | day | 15 | 53 |
| Total major project-oriented trainings - Total length of time | day | 96 | 53 |
| Total training fees of the Company | 0.000RMB | 275 | 53 |
| Total training hours | hours | 66990 | 7 |
| Total training hours of the Company | hours | 66990 | 53 |
| Total training investment of the Company | 0.000RMB, million RMB | 4.23 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yadong - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yadong - Training hours | hours | 1392 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yali - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 5 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yali - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 5 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yali - Training hours | hours | 2262 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yaxin - Man-hour costs | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yaxin - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 3 | 53 |
| Wuhan Yaxin - Training hours | hours | 1392 | 53 |
| Yangzhou Yadong - Total training fees | 0.000RMB | 7 | 53 |
| Yangzhou Yadong - Training hours | hours | 2958 | 53 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer satisfaction rate | % | 96% | 60 |
Description of practices relating to observing and protecting intellectual property rights.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product certificate rate | % | 100% | 60 |
Focus areas of contribution (e.g. education, environmental concerns, labour needs, health, culture, sport).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount for community auxiliary facilities and services | RMB | 74675 | 14 |
| Amount for community interaction – assisting communities in environmental beautification | RMB | 314600 | 14 |
| Amount for community welfare – meeting community demand through engineering specialty | RMB | 735580 | 14 |
| Amount for maintaining friendly relations with the communities | RMB | 26100 | 14 |
| Amount for promoting community education services | RMB | 158750 | 14 |
| Amount for providing home repair services | RMB | 23776 | 14 |
| Amount invested in community care and beautification by Asia Cement (China) | RMB | 1333481 | 14 |
| Investment in social club activities | RMB | 110000 | 51 |
| Local resident communication sessions | sessions | 30 | 7 |
| Local residents involved in communication | people | 190 | 7 |
| Number of employees joining social club activities | person | 1800 | 51 |
| Number of participants for factory visits by local party member representatives | participants | 120 | 14 |
| Number of participants for settlement of production disputes between plants and mines | participants | 70 | 14 |
| Number of sessions for factory visits by local party member representatives | sessions | 5 | 14 |
| Social stability expenditure | million RMB | 1.58 | 7 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total union fees | million RMB | 4 | 52 |
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions | ton | 898.5999999999999 | 839.4 | 560.6 |
| NOₓ Emissions | ton | 11161.5 | 10562.2 | 9604.4 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total GHG Emissions | tons | 21854000 | 20768000 | 21925000 |
| Total GHG Emissions Intensity (By Product Weight) | tCO2/t clinker | 0.899 | 0.859 | 0.884 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Hazardous Waste | ton | 13669 | 13364 | 12017 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hazardous Waste (Construction Waste) | ton | 8934 | 7931 | 2179 |
| Non-Hazardous Waste (Domestic Waste) | ton | 1440 | 1512 | 1365 |
| Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | ton | 12017 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons | 205000 |
| GHG Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons CO2 | 205000 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption Intensity (By Unit Product) | MCAL/ton | 2.7 | 661.45 | 2.76 |
| Percentage of Renewable Energy Consumption | % | 29.55 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Recycled Water Usage | ton | 339637 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | MWh | 8960 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Investment in Ecological Restoration | million RMB | 48.16 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Female Employees | persons | 618 | 582 | 558 | 483 |
| Number of Male Employees | persons | 4274 | 3999 | 3699 | 3404 |
| Number of New Employees | persons | 361 | 764 | ||
| Number of New Employees (Above 50) | 11 | ||||
| Number of New Employees (Aged 30-50) | 155 | ||||
| Number of New Employees (Aged Below 30) | 236 | ||||
| Number of New Employees (Female) | persons | 403 | |||
| Number of New Employees (Male) | persons | 361 | |||
| Number of Total Employees | employees | 487 | 377 | 318 | 3887 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Female) | ||
| Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Male) | ||
| Turnover Rate of Total Employees | percent | 11 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Lost Days Due to Work-related Injuries | days | 105 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment in Work Safety | 0.000RMB | 23 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of New Employees Trained | % | 100 |
| Total Cost of Training | RMB'000 | 364 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Average Training Hours per Employee | hours | 17 |
| Total Training Hours | hours | 66990 |