2017 Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dust at Chengdu Yali | 10 | 49 | |||
Dust at Huanggang Yadong | 80 | 49 | |||
Dust at Jiangxi Yadong | 535 | 49 | |||
Dust at Nanchang Yadong | 29 | 49 | |||
Dust at Nanchang Yali | 38 | 49 | |||
Dust at Shanghai Yadong | 20 | 49 | |||
Dust at Sichuan Lanfeng | 275 | 49 | |||
Dust at Sichuan Taixi | 13 | 49 | |||
Dust at Sichuan Yadong | 323 | 49 | |||
Dust at Sichuan Yali | 48 | 49 | |||
Dust at Taizhou Yadong | 20 | 49 | |||
Dust at Wuhan Yadong | 79 | 49 | |||
Dust at Wuhan Yaxin | 244 | 49 | |||
Dust at Yangzhou Yadong | 27 | 49 | |||
Nitrogen oxide emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 2000 | 2000 | 2000 | 23 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton | 468.6 | 985 | 688.6 | 24 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton | 1817.4 | 1301.3 | 1170.9 | 24 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 4402 | 4617 | 4624 | 24 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 1467 | 1294 | 1662 | 24 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton | 2164 | 2460 | 1927.1 | 24 |
Nitrogen oxide emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 723.2 | 504.5 | 489.6 | 24 |
Noise at Huanggang Yadong | 25 | 49 | |||
Noise at Jiangxi Yadong | 79 | 49 | |||
Noise at Nanchang Yadong | 29 | 49 | |||
Noise at Sichuan Yadong | 317 | 49 | |||
Noise at Wuhan Yaxin | 244 | 49 | |||
Particulate pollutant emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton | 9 | 29.1 | 27.6 | 24 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton | 208.3 | 163 | 183.6 | 24 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 323 | 261 | 244 | 24 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 267.2 | 150.7 | 172 | 24 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton | 215.4 | 239.4 | 160.4 | 24 |
Particulate pollutant emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 116.5 | 55.4 | 51.8 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton | 50 | 84.6 | 105.6 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton | 227.7 | 338.4 | 131.8 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 529 | 726 | 1182 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 130 | 135.9 | 85 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton | 99.1 | 111.5 | 89.6 | 24 |
SO2 emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 111.6 | 49 | 10 | 24 |
Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Nanchang Yadong) | 1 | 27 | |||
Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Shanghai Yali) | 2 | 27 | |||
Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Sichuan Lanfeng) | 2 | 27 | |||
Times of being fined for violation of environmental laws (Sichuan Yadong) | 2 | 27 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average emission intensity of CO2 in Asia Cement (China) | tCO2/t clinker | 0.897 | 0.899 | 0.859 | 20 |
Decrease in CO2 emission | tons | 12051 | 7 | ||
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Huanggang Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.908 | 0.932 | 0.865 | 20 |
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Hubei Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.897 | 0.922 | 0.844 | 20 |
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Jiangxi Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.893 | 0.879 | 0.858 | 20 |
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Sichuan Lanfeng | tCO2/t clinker | 0.909 | 0.872 | 0.875 | 20 |
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Sichuan Yadong | tCO2/t clinker | 0.91 | 0.907 | 0.873 | 20 |
Emission intensity of greenhouse gas (CO2) of clinker products, Wuhan Yaxin | tCO2/t clinker | 0.944 | 0.936 | 0.841 | 20 |
SO2 emission Huanggang Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
SO2 emission Hubei Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
SO2 emission Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
SO2 emission Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
SO2 emission Sichuan Yadong | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
SO2 emission Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 500 | 500 | 500 | 23 |
Total emission of CO2 in Asia Cement (China) | 10000 tons | 2153.6 | 2185.4 | 2076.8 | 20 |
Total emission of CO2, Huanggang Yadong | 0000 tons | 158.2 | 149.9 | 141.7 | 19 |
Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong | 0000 tons | 335.9 | 302.7 | 290.9 | 19 |
Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong | 0000 tons | 1001.6 | 1001.1 | 1000.6 | 19 |
Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng | 0000 tons | 217.5 | 242.7 | 241.1 | 19 |
Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong | 0000 tons | 341.7 | 398 | 325.4 | 19 |
Total emission of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin | 0000 tons | 98.7 | 91 | 77.1 | 19 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desulfurization gypsum (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 52552 | 87059 | 91194 | 16 |
Desulfurization gypsum (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 127000 | 144040 | 131650 | 16 |
High magnesium limestone incorporated into cement production by Huanggang Yadong Mine | million tons | 1.34 | 12 | ||
Subtotal industrial wastes (Nanchang Yadong) | tons | 222355 | 177923 | 172038 | 16 |
Subtotal industrial wastes (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 261157 | 379110 | 486968 | 16 |
Subtotal industrial wastes (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 540974 | 474281 | 455340 | 16 |
Subtotal wastes disposal (Cement Companies and Cement Grinding Companies under Asia Cement China) | tons | 20184 | 13669 | 13364 | 16 |
Waste batteries | tons | 2.6 | 2.6 | 4 | 16 |
Waste belts and tires | tons | 209 | 171 | 588 | 16 |
Waste chemical test solution | tons | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4 | 16 |
Waste lubricating oil and engine oil | tons | 213 | 358 | 162 | 16 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coal slag (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 117541 | 145719 | 16 | |
Coal slag (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 69952 | 37346 | 43990 | 16 |
Electric furnace slag (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 10531 | 4008 | 16 | |
Electric furnace slag (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 3056 | 12023 | 52871 | 16 |
Fly-ash (Nanchang Yadong) | tons | 90615 | 58187 | 66493 | 16 |
Fly-ash (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 26667 | 30184 | 23194 | 16 |
Fly-ash (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 328126 | 236214 | 150030 | 16 |
Household wastes | tons | 1438 | 1440 | 1512 | 16 |
Non-ferrous metal slag (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 76102 | 8228 | 78808 | 16 |
Others (waste wood) | tons | 0.05 | 0.06 | 14 | 16 |
Phosphogypsum (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 17919 | 11621 | 4769 | 16 |
Refractory bricks | tons | 171 | 170 | 572 | 16 |
Waste metal | tons | 1881 | 2586 | 2572 | 16 |
Waste paper | tons | 6 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
Waste soil, gravel, waste concrete, and test blocks | tons | 16261 | 8934 | 7931 | 16 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
CO2 emission reduction | tons | 12051 | 21 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industrial waste comprehensively utilized | million tons | 6.9686 | 7 | ||
Industrial wastes utilized, Huanggang Yadong | tons | 479312 | 372209 | 410445 | 15 |
Industrial wastes utilized, Hubei Yadong | tons | 1251599 | 1846895 | 1878638 | 15 |
Industrial wastes utilized, Jiangxi Yadong | tons | 1050870 | 1262142 | 1361591 | 15 |
Industrial wastes utilized, Sichuan Lanfeng | tons | 152394 | 446614 | 822398 | 15 |
Industrial wastes utilized, Sichuan Yadong | tons | 451572 | 572733 | 611374 | 15 |
Industrial wastes utilized, Wuhan Yaxin | tons | 720297 | 681933 | 769816 | 15 |
Spoil waste soil blended into crushing machine by Sichuan Yadong | tons | 300000 | 12 | ||
Spoil waste soil mixed by Jiangxi Yadong | tons | 130000 | 12 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clinker output in Asia Cement (China) | 10000 tons | 2399.8 | 2431.4 | 2416.6 | 20 |
Clinker output, Huanggang Yadong | 0000 tons | 174.3 | 160.8 | 163.8 | 19 |
Clinker output, Hubei Yadong | 0000 tons | 374.3 | 328.4 | 344.6 | 19 |
Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong | 0000 tons | 1122 | 1139.4 | 1168.3 | 19 |
Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng | 0000 tons | 249.4 | 267 | 275.4 | 19 |
Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong | 0000 tons | 375.3 | 438.6 | 372.8 | 19 |
Clinker output, Wuhan Yaxin | 0000 tons | 104.5 | 97.2 | 91.7 | 19 |
Energy density (six cement companies) | GJ/ton cement | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.77 | 23 |
Limestone powder (Nanchang Yadong) | tons | 131740 | 119736 | 105545 | 16 |
Limestone powder (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 85590 | 113946 | 106894 | 16 |
Limestone powder (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 12840 | 44658 | 75286 | 16 |
Limestone transported by Sichuan Yadong using long belt conveyor | million tons | 5.19 | 12 | ||
Percentage of electricity consumption from waste heat | 28% | 7 | |||
Power consumption of plant | MWh | 2225985 | 2360245 | 2238146 | 23 |
Proportion of waste heat power generation | % | 28.41 | 27.37 | 27.99 | 23 |
Sichuan Yadong investment in long-distance belt conveyor construction | million RMB | 442 | 7 | ||
Standard coal conserved | tons | 2120 | 7 | ||
Standard coal used | tons | 2120 | 21 | ||
Total length of belt conveyor of the mine | kilometers | 26.3 | 7 | ||
Truck transportation fee saved by using long belt conveyor | RMB per ton | 8.8 | 12 | ||
Waste heat recovery net power generation | MWh | 632474 | 645986 | 624619 | 23 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Average clinker consumption in cement reduced by Hubei Yadong | tons | 20000 | 22 |
Electricity conserved | million kWh | 8.6054 | 7 |
Energy saved | MWh | 8605.4 | 21 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Hubei Yadong - replacement of metal halide lamps with electrodeless lamps | MWh | 198.4 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Hubei Yadong - transformation of #2 cement mill and capacitor of #1 raw material mill | MWh | 410.4 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - #3 & #4 coolers deactivated two windmills during winter | MWh | 884.7 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - #4 raw material mill with dust collector disabled | MWh | 201.1 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - #5 & #6 production lines use energy of downhill belt to generate electricity | MWh | 995.9 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - harmonic treatment on #1 cooler system | MWh | 158.3 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - steel ball in chamber 2 of #1 cement grinding ball mill replaced with ceramic ball | MWh | 1800 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - transformation of dust collection pipes of lifters for recycled materials from #5 & #6 raw material mills | MWh | 213.3 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Jiangxi Yadong - transformation of dust collection pipes of vertical screw conveyor of #7 sandstone silo | MWh | 30 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Sichuan Lanfeng - transformation of fire and water recirculating systems in all plants | MWh | 2400 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Sichuan Yadong - variable frequency drives added to exhaust windmill of #1 coal mill | MWh | 192.7 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Wuhan Yaxin - high-energy consuming motors replaced with energy-saving motors in all plants | MWh | 57.6 | 22 |
Reduced electricity consumption by Wuhan Yaxin - low-voltage reactive power compensation transformation in all plants | MWh | 1063 | 22 |
Standard coal saved by Hubei Yadong due to reduced clinker consumption | tons | 2120 | 22 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of bag type cement package of total shipment (Asia Cement China) | % | 19 | 75 | ||
Percentage of bulk cement package of total shipment (Asia Cement China) | % | 81 | 75 | ||
Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag, Nanchang Yadong | 10000 tons | 22.24 | 17.79 | 17.2 | 15 |
Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag, Wuhan Yadong | 10000 tons | 26.12 | 37.91 | 48.7 | 15 |
Total Utilization Volume of Industrial Slag, Yangzhou Yadong | 10000 tons | 54.1 | 47.43 | 45.53 | 15 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Huanggang Yadong | 10000 tons | 47.9 | 37.2 | 41 | 14 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Hubei Yadong | 10000 tons | 125.2 | 184.7 | 187.9 | 14 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Jiangxi Yadong | 10000 tons | 105.1 | 126.2 | 136.2 | 14 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | 10000 tons | 15.2 | 44.7 | 82.2 | 14 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Sichuan Yadong | 10000 tons | 45.2 | 57.3 | 61.1 | 14 |
Total utilization volume of industrial slag - Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 72 | 68.2 | 77 | 14 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Area of planting and restoration in mine | hectares | 9.33 | 81 |
Grass and tree seeds sowed in Jiangxi, Huanggang, Sichuan mines | kilograms | 140 | 7 |
Greening and reclamation area of mines | hectares | 1.7 | 7 |
Hectares of mines reclaimed in Jiangxi, Huanggang, Sichuan mines | hectares | 9.33 | 7 |
Investment in long belt conveyor construction by Sichuan Yadong | million RMB | 442 | 12 |
Jiangxi Yadong investment in dams and sedimentation tank construction | million RMB | 2 | 7 |
Length of long distance belt conveyor constructed by Sichuan Yadong | kilometers | 13.7 | 12 |
Length of long-distance belt conveyor constructed by Sichuan Yadong | kilometers | 13.7 | 7 |
Length of mine long-haul belt conveyor constructed by Sichuan Yadong | kilometers | 26.3 | 12 |
Number of trees planted in Jiangxi, Huanggang, Sichuan mines | trees | 8666 | 7 |
Others (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 32382 | 16 |
Others (Yangzhou Yadong) | tons | 1513 | 16 |
Processing capacity of cement kiln co-disposal sludge project at Hubei Yadong | tons of sludge per day | 1200 | 13 |
Description of the significant climate-related issues which have impacted, and those which may impact, the issuer, and the actions taken to manage them.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
High temperature at Jiangxi Yadong | 54 | 49 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
Indicator | Unit | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Board meeting attendance rate - CHANG Chen-kuen (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - CHANG Tsai-hsiung (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - HSU Shu-ping (Vice Chairman) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - HSU Shu-tong (Chairman) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - LEE Kao-chao (Independent Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - LIN Seng-chang (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - TSIM Tak-lung Dominic (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - WANG Kuo-ming (Independent Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - WANG Wei (Independent Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - WU Chung-lih (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Board meeting attendance rate - WU Ling-ling (Executive Director) | 100% | 56 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 38 | 37 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 13 | 37 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 51 | 37 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 6 | 37 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 45 | 37 | ||||
Chengdu Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 51 | 37 | ||||
Employee satisfaction score | 49 | 35 | ||||
Employee satisfaction survey participation rate | percent | 32.2% | 35 | |||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 98 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 173 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 271 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 23 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 248 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 271 | 37 | ||||
Huanggang Yadong Employment rate | % | 9.68% | 37 | |||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 150 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 234 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 384 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 50 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 334 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 384 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yadong Employment rate | % | 17.07% | 37 | |||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 29 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 84 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 113 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 7 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 106 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 113 | 37 | ||||
Hubei Yali Employment rate | % | 6.99% | 37 | |||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 556 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 469 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 1025 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 119 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 906 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 1025 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 67 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 59 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 126 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 6 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 120 | 37 | ||||
Jiangxi Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 126 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 7 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 41 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 48 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 6 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 42 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 48 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yadong Employment rate | % | 8.16% | 37 | |||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 79 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 19 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 98 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 22 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 76 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 98 | 37 | ||||
Nanchang Yali Employment rate | % | 41.30% | 37 | |||
Number of administrative employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 214 | 36 | |||
Number of competent employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 510 | 36 | |||
Number of employees reprimanded | employees | 247 | 44 | |||
Number of employees with demerit | employees | 66 | 44 | |||
Number of employees with merit | employees | 2 | 44 | |||
Number of employees with special demerit | employees | 34 | 44 | |||
Number of factory employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 2640 | 36 | |||
Number of long-term borrowed employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 416 | 394 | 377 | 318 | 36 |
Number of long-term borrowed female employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 321 | 303 | 296 | 255 | 36 |
Number of long-term borrowed male employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 95 | 91 | 81 | 63 | 36 |
Number of official employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 4632 | 4498 | 4204 | 3929 | 36 |
Number of official female employees | persons | 522 | 527 | 501 | 495 | 35 |
Number of official male employees | persons | 4110 | 3971 | 3703 | 3434 | 35 |
Number of sales employees of Asia Cement (China) | persons | 565 | 36 | |||
Operating revenue | RMB'000 | 6391165 | 6338152 | 7815527 | 60 | |
Participation in the Group’s joint meeting in Taiwan - Number of employees | 38 | 43 | ||||
Percentage of administrative employees of Asia Cement (China) | percent | 5.4% | 36 | |||
Percentage of competent employees of Asia Cement (China) | percent | 13.0% | 36 | |||
Percentage of factory employees of Asia Cement (China) | percent | 67.2% | 36 | |||
Percentage of sales employees of Asia Cement (China) | percent | 14.4% | 36 | |||
Return on equity rights and interests | % | 8.3 | -3 | 1.6 | 6.4 | 60 |
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 18 | 37 | ||||
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 26 | 37 | ||||
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 44 | 37 | ||||
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 7 | 37 | ||||
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 37 | 37 | ||||
Shanghai Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 44 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 215 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 205 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee contract Total | 420 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee gender Female | 85 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee gender Male | 335 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng 2017 employee gender Total | 420 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Lanfeng Employment rate | % | 5.63% | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 379 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 195 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 574 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 55 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 519 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 574 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yadong Employment rate | % | 11.32% | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 73 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 18 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 47 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 6 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 41 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 47 | 37 | ||||
Sichuan Yali Employment rate | % | 11.11% | 37 | |||
Surplus per share | RMB | -0.191 | 0.085 | 0.384 | 60 | |
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 27 | 37 | ||||
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 8 | 37 | ||||
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 35 | 37 | ||||
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 6 | 37 | ||||
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 29 | 37 | ||||
Taizhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 35 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 1893 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 2036 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee contract Total | 3929 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee gender Female | 495 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee gender Male | 3434 | 37 | ||||
Total 2017 employee gender Total | 3929 | 37 | ||||
Total Employment rate | % | 9.47% | 37 | |||
Total New staff | 398 | 37 | ||||
Total assets | RMB'000 | 17627180 | 15902155 | 16409987 | 60 | |
Total liabilities | RMB'000 | 8056254 | 6267007 | 6199603 | 60 | |
Total working hours - Chengdu Yali | hours | 139920 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Huanggang Yadong | hours | 720720 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Hubei Yadong | hours | 1100880 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Hubei Yali | hours | 31680 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Jiangxi Yadong | hours | 2597760 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Jiangxi Yali | hours | 330000 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Nanchang Yadong | hours | 132000 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Nanchang Yali | hours | 256080 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Shanghai Yali | hours | 139920 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Sichuan Lanfeng | hours | 1119360 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Sichuan Yadong | hours | 1539120 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Sichuan Yali | hours | 232320 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Sichuan Yali (2) | hours | 124080 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Taizhou Yadong | hours | 95040 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Total | hours | 10174560 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Wuhan Yadong | hours | 232320 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Wuhan Yali | hours | 132000 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Wuhan Yaxin | hours | 805200 | 48 | |||
Total working hours - Yangzhou Yadong | hours | 446160 | 48 | |||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 23 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 64 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 87 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 8 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 79 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 87 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 27 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 23 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee contract Total | 50 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee gender Female | 8 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee gender Male | 42 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yali 2017 employee gender Total | 50 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 33 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 267 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee contract Total | 300 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee gender Female | 51 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee gender Male | 249 | 37 | ||||
Wuhan Yaxin 2017 employee gender Total | 300 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Fixed-term labour contract | 45 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Permanent labour contract | 124 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee contract Total | 169 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Female | 24 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Male | 145 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong 2017 employee gender Total | 169 | 37 | ||||
Yangzhou Yadong Employment rate | % | 14.36% | 37 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chengdu Yali Employment rate | % | 1.69% | 37 | ||
Chengdu Yali New staff | 1 | 37 | |||
Chengdu Yali Resigned staff | 9 | 37 | |||
Chengdu Yali Turnover rate | % | 15.25% | 37 | ||
Huanggang Yadong New staff | 27 | 37 | |||
Huanggang Yadong Resigned staff | 30 | 37 | |||
Huanggang Yadong Turnover rate | % | 10.75% | 37 | ||
Hubei Yadong New staff | 70 | 37 | |||
Hubei Yadong Resigned staff | 96 | 37 | |||
Hubei Yadong Turnover rate | % | 23.41% | 37 | ||
Hubei Yali New staff | 10 | 37 | |||
Hubei Yali Resigned staff | 41 | 37 | |||
Hubei Yali Turnover rate | % | 28.67% | 37 | ||
Jiangxi Yadong Employment rate | % | 7.34% | 37 | ||
Jiangxi Yadong New staff | 76 | 37 | |||
Jiangxi Yadong Resigned staff | 86 | 37 | |||
Jiangxi Yadong Turnover rate | % | 8.30% | 37 | ||
Jiangxi Yali Employment rate | % | 3.91% | 37 | ||
Jiangxi Yali New staff | 5 | 37 | |||
Jiangxi Yali Resigned staff | 10 | 37 | |||
Jiangxi Yali Turnover rate | % | 7.81% | 37 | ||
Nanchang Yadong New staff | 4 | 37 | |||
Nanchang Yadong Resigned staff | 5 | 37 | |||
Nanchang Yadong Turnover rate | % | 10.20% | 37 | ||
Nanchang Yali New staff | 38 | 37 | |||
Nanchang Yali Resigned staff | 33 | 37 | |||
Nanchang Yali Turnover rate | % | 35.87% | 37 | ||
Operating gross profit | RMB'000 | 956262 | 1250152 | 1910344 | 60 |
Shanghai Yali Employment rate | % | 22.50% | 37 | ||
Shanghai Yali New staff | 9 | 37 | |||
Shanghai Yali Resigned staff | 33 | 37 | |||
Shanghai Yali Turnover rate | % | 82.50% | 37 | ||
Sichuan Lanfeng New staff | 24 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Lanfeng Resigned staff | 32 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Lanfeng Turnover rate | % | 7.51% | 37 | ||
Sichuan Yadong New staff | 66 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yadong Resigned staff | 78 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yadong Turnover rate | % | 13.38% | 37 | ||
Sichuan Yali New staff | 13 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yali Resigned staff | 14 | 37 | |||
Sichuan Yali Turnover rate | % | 24.56% | 37 | ||
Taizhou Yadong Employment rate | % | 6.06% | 37 | ||
Taizhou Yadong New staff | 4 | 37 | |||
Taizhou Yadong Resigned staff | 9 | 37 | |||
Taizhou Yadong Turnover rate | % | 13.64% | 37 | ||
Total Resigned staff | 673 | 37 | |||
Total Turnover rate | % | 16.01% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yadong Employment rate | % | 4.30% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yadong New staff | 4 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yadong Resigned staff | 14 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yadong Turnover rate | % | 15.05% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yali Employment rate | % | 3.23% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yali New staff | 4 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yali Resigned staff | 74 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yali Turnover rate | % | 59.68% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yaxin Employment rate | % | 3.82% | 37 | ||
Wuhan Yaxin New staff | 12 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yaxin Resigned staff | 28 | 37 | |||
Wuhan Yaxin Turnover rate | % | 8.92% | 37 | ||
Yangzhou Yadong New staff | 27 | 37 | |||
Yangzhou Yadong Resigned staff | 41 | 37 | |||
Yangzhou Yadong Turnover rate | % | 21.81% | 37 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Total - Female | 1.52 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Total - Male | 1.86 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Total - Subtotal | 1.86 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 7.42 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 4.47 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Subtotal | 4.96 | 50 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 3.57 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Subtotal | 0.16 | 51 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Total | 1.86 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Total - Male | 0.19 | 51 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Total - Subtotal | 0.16 | 51 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Wuhan Yaxin | 4.96 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Subtotal | 0.03 | 51 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total | 0.25 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total - Male | 0.03 | 51 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total - Subtotal | 0.03 | 51 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Wuhan Yaxin | 0.83 | 48 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 0.15 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Huanggang Yadong - Subtotal | 0.14 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 0.16 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yadong - Subtotal | 0.13 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 0.38 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yadong - Subtotal | 0.33 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 0.39 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yali - Subtotal | 0.37 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Nanchang Yali - Male | 0.66 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Nanchang Yali - Subtotal | 0.51 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Female | 0.44 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 0.3 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Subtotal | 0.33 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Total - Female | 0.2 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Total - Male | 0.25 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Total - Subtotal | 0.25 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 1.17 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 0.76 | 50 | |
Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Wuhan Yaxin - Subtotal | 0.83 | 50 | |
Material occupational disasters - Huanggang Yadong | 1 | 48 | |
Material occupational disasters - Total | 1 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Huanggang Yadong | 2 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Hubei Yadong | 2 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Jiangxi Yadong | 5 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Jiangxi Yali | 1 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Nanchang Yali | 1 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Lanfeng | 4 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Total | 19 | 48 | |
Ordinary occupational disasters - Wuhan Yaxin | 4 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 7 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Hubei Yadong | 10 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 58 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Jiangxi Yali | 45 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 437 | 51 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Nanchang Yadong - Subtotal | 344 | 51 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Nanchang Yali | 66 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 31 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Subtotal | 5 | 51 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Total | 34 | 48 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Total - Male | 6 | 51 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Total - Subtotal | 5 | 51 | |
SR (Severity Rate) - Wuhan Yaxin | 138 | 48 |
Lost days due to work injury.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 3.03 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Huanggang Yadong - Subtotal | 2.77 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 2.14 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yadong - Subtotal | 1.81 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 2.16 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Subtotal | 1.92 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 3.21 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yali - Subtotal | 3.03 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Nanchang Yali - Male | 5.05 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Nanchang Yali - Subtotal | 3.9 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Female | 4.35 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 3.37 | 50 | |
Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Subtotal | 3.57 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 8 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Huanggang Yadong - Subtotal | 7 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 12 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yadong - Subtotal | 10 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 65 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Subtotal | 58 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 48 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yali - Subtotal | 45 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Nanchang Yali - Male | 86 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Nanchang Yali - Subtotal | 66 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Female | 44 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 28 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Subtotal | 31 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Total - Female | 27 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Total - Male | 34 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Total - Subtotal | 34 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 186 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 128 | 50 | |
Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Subtotal | 138 | 50 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 2.77 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Hubei Yadong | 1.81 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 1.92 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Jiangxi Yali | 3.03 | 48 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 14.56 | 51 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Nanchang Yadong - Subtotal | 11.47 | 51 | |
FR (Frequency Rate) - Nanchang Yali | 3.9 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Huanggang Yadong | 0.14 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Hubei Yadong | 0.13 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Jiangxi Yadong | 0.33 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Jiangxi Yali | 0.37 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 2.52 | 51 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Nanchang Yadong - Subtotal | 1.99 | 51 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Nanchang Yali | 0.51 | 48 | |
FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 0.33 | 48 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Number of employees who accepted health check | employees | 3685 | 52 |
Number of female employees who accepted health check | employees | 443 | 52 |
Number of male employees who accepted health check | employees | 3242 | 52 |
Total cost invested in employee health checks | RMB | 610992 | 52 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Attendance Rate (AR) - Huanggang Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 0.01% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Hubei Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 0.01% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 0.05% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yali - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 0.04% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yali - Female | 0.00% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yali - Male | 0.07% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Female | 0.03% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 0.02% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 0.15% | 50 | |
Attendance Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 0.10% | 50 | |
Elite class training - Echelon Completed | 6 | 43 | |
Elite class training - Number of employees | 41 | 43 | |
Intensive training for new comers - Echelon Completed | 2 | 43 | |
Intensive training for new comers - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 11 | 43 |
Intensive training for new comers - Number of employees | 159 | 43 | |
Number of employees rewarded | employees | 273 | 44 |
Number of participants in employee satisfaction survey | persons | 1267 | 35 |
Participation in the Group’s joint meeting in Taiwan - Echelon Completed | 2 | 43 | |
Participation in the Group’s joint meeting in Taiwan - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 60 | 43 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Elite class training - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 150 | 43 |
Elite class training - Total length of time | days | 16 | 43 |
Intensive training for new comers - Total length of time | days | 10 | 43 |
Investment in training per employee | RMB | 688 | 43 |
Participation in the Group’s joint meeting in Taiwan - Total length of time | days | 10 | 43 |
Staff annual training duration (all types of staff) | hours on average | 16 | 81 |
Team execution and QCC training - Echelon Completed | 11 | 43 | |
Team execution and QCC training - Expenditure | RMB'000 | 42 | 43 |
Team execution and QCC training - Number of employees | 579 | 43 | |
Team execution and QCC training - Total length of time | days | 33 | 43 |
Total investment in training | million RMB | 2.7 | 43 |
Total training hours of the Company | hours | 61408 | 43 |
Training hours for each employee | hours | 16 | 43 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual economic growth rate of China | % | 6.9 | 4 | ||
Customer satisfaction | customer satisfaction | 95% | 81 | ||
Customer satisfaction rate | 95% | 7 | |||
Income tax expenses | RMB'000 | 45375 | 179364 | 348627 | 60 |
Non-operational balance | RMB'000 | -465819 | -233408 | -251504 | 60 |
Description of preventive measures and whistle-blowing procedures, and how they are implemented and monitored.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Audit Committee meeting attendance rate - HSU Shu-tong (Member) | 100% | 56 | |
Audit Committee meeting attendance rate - LEE Kao-chao (Member) | 100% | 56 | |
Audit Committee meeting attendance rate - TSIM Tak-lung Dominic (Chairman) | 100% | 56 | |
Independent Committee attendance rate (Chairman: LEE Kao-chao) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Independent Committee attendance rate (Member: TSIM Tak-lung Dominic) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Independent Committee attendance rate (Member: WANG Kuo-ming) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Nomination Committee attendance rate (Chairman: HSU Shu-tong) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Nomination Committee attendance rate (Member: TSIM Tak-lung Dominic) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Nomination Committee attendance rate (Member: WANG Wei) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Number of Audit Committee meetings held | 2 | 56 | |
Remuneration Committee attendance rate (Chairman: WANG Kuo-ming) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Remuneration Committee attendance rate (Member: HSU Shu-tong) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Remuneration Committee attendance rate (Member: TSIM Tak-lung Dominic) | attendance rate | 100% | 57 |
Description of anti-corruption training provided to directors and staff.
Indicator | Unit | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Board meetings held | 4 | 56 |
Focus areas of contribution (e.g. education, environmental concerns, labour needs, health, culture, sport).
Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cement donated to neighboring communities | RMB | 878108 | 7 | |
Hubei Yadong - 2016 Outstanding Tax Contribution Enterprise, ranked 3rd in paying taxes in Wuhan Yangluo Economic Development Zone | rank | 3 | 67 | |
Investment in club activities | RMB'000 | 400 | 41 | |
Sichuan Lafeng - 2017 Chengdu Top 100 Private Enterprises, ranked 88th | rank | 88 | 67 | |
Sichuan Yadong - 2017 Chengdu Manufacturing Industry Top 100, ranked 71st | rank | 71 | 67 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggregate value of donations to neighboring communities | RMB | 883409 | 7 | ||
Cash donated to neighboring communities | RMB | 5300 | 7 | ||
Distributable surplus per share | dollar | 0.384 | 7 | ||
Number of times donations made to neighboring communities | 15 | 7 | |||
Operating costs | RMB'000 | 5434903 | 5088000 | 5905183 | 60 |
Social expenditures | million RMB | 2.1 | 7 | ||
Total equity | RMB'000 | 9570926 | 9635148 | 10210384 | 60 |
Total union fees | more than RMB3 million | 38 |
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions | ton | 1139.4 | 898.6 | 838.4 |
NOâ‚“ Emissions | ton | 11075.2 | 12161.8 | 11562.2 |
SOâ‚“ Emissions | ton | 1147.4 | 1445.4 | 1604 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total GHG Emissions | tons | 21536000 | 21854000 | 20768000 |
Total GHG Emissions Intensity (By Product Volume) | tCO2/t clinker | 0.897 | 0.899 | 0.859 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hazardous Waste (Used Batteries) | tons | 2.6 | 2.6 | 4 |
Total Hazardous Waste | tons | 426.5 | 533.8 | 758 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Hazardous Waste (Construction Waste) | tons | 16261 | 8934 | 7931 |
Non-Hazardous Waste (Domestic Waste) | tons | 1438 | 1440 | 1512 |
Paper Waste | tons | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons | 12051 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Energy Consumption Intensity (By Unit Product) | GJ/ton cement | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.77 |
Proportion of waste heat power generation | % | 28.41 | 27.37 | 27.99 |
Purchased Electricity | MWh | 2225985 | 2360245 | 2238146 |
Total Purchased Energy | MWh | 2225985 | 2360245 | 2238146 |
Waste heat recovery net power generation | MWh | 632474 | 645986 | 624619 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Electricity Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | MWh | 8605.4 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Packaging Material Intensity (By Unit Product) | % | 19 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Total Investment in Ecological Restoration | million RMB | 444 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Female Employees | persons | 843 | 830 | 797 | 750 |
Number of Male Employees | persons | 4205 | 4062 | 3784 | 3497 |
Number of New Employees | 398 | ||||
Number of New Employees (Above 50) | 20 | ||||
Number of New Employees (Aged 30-50) | 93 | ||||
Number of New Employees (Aged Below 30) | 285 | ||||
Number of New Employees (Female) | 65 | ||||
Number of New Employees (Male) | 333 | ||||
Number of Total Employees | persons | 5048 | 4892 | 4581 | 4247 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Turnover Rate of Total Employees | % | 16.01 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Number of Fatalities as a Result of Work-related Injuries | 1 | |
Number of Work-related Fatalities | 1 |
Lost days due to work injury.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR/LTIR) | 2.77 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Health Check Coverage for Employees | % | 100 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Total Cost of Training | RMB'000 | 71 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Average Training Hours per Employee | hours | 16 |
Total Training Hours | hours | 61408 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Satisfaction Rate of Customer Complaint Handling | % | 95 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 |
---|---|---|
Number of Volunteer Activities Sessions | 15 | |
Total Cash Donations | RMB | 5300 |
Total Public Welfare Donations | RMB | 883409 |
Total Social Investment | million RMB | 2.1 |