2023 Climate Action Progress Report
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHG emissions, City gas segment, Scope 1 | tCO2e | 14316.2 | 11999.2 | 13114.5 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, City gas segment, Scope 2 | tCO2e | 21197.3 | 20189.0 | 24632.0 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, City gas segment, Total | tCO2e | 35513.4 | 32188.3 | 37746.5 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Integrated energy segment, Scope 1 | tCO2e | 169982.3 | 201668.9 | 229700.1 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Integrated energy segment, Scope 2 | tCO2e | 43230.3 | 45223.2 | 77064.4 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Integrated energy segment, Total | tCO2e | 213212.6 | 246892.1 | 306764.5 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, LNG segment, Scope 1 | tCO2e | 2361.4 | 7578.8 | 10656.3 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, LNG segment, Scope 2 | tCO2e | 28588.5 | 32680.7 | 55238.9 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, LNG segment, Total | tCO2e | 30950.0 | 40259.6 | 65895.2 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Total, Scope 1 | tCO2e | 186659.9 | 221246.9 | 253470.9 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Total, Scope 1 and 2 | tCO2e | 279676.0 | 319339.9 | 410406.2 | 41 |
| GHG emissions, Total, Scope 2 | tCO2e | 93016.1 | 98092.9 | 156935.3 | 41 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2040 | 2050 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Gas Methane Emission Intensity Target (below) | % | 0.12 | 39 | |||||
| Beijing Gas methane emission intensity target for 2025 | % | below 0.12 | 5 | |||||
| Beijing Gas methane emission intensity target for 2030 | near zero | 5 | ||||||
| China's carbon pricing (Baseline-emission scenario, 2020) | USD | 30 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (Baseline-emission scenario, 2040) | USD | 95 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050) | USD | 160 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (High-emission scenario, 2019) | USD | 17 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (High-emission scenario, 2020) | USD | 30 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (High-emission scenario, 2025) | USD | 45 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (Low-emission scenario, 2020) | USD | 90 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (Low-emission scenario, 2040) | USD | 160 | 43 | |||||
| China's carbon pricing (Low-emission scenario, 2050) | USD | 200 | 43 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of waste-to-energy plants operated in China under BEHL | 17 | 12 | |
| Number of waste-to-energy plants operated in Germany under EEW GmbH (BEHL) | 17 | 12 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | 2030 | 2050 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEHL waste-to-energy capacity | tonnes/day | 34232 | 12 | ||
| Natural gas share of energy consumption in China (Baseline-emission scenario) | % | 14.5 | 10 | 44 | |
| Natural gas share of energy consumption in China (High-emission scenario) | % | 14.9 | 15.3 | 44 | |
| Renewable energy accounts for share of energy supply in China (Baseline-emission scenario, 2030) | % | 18.07 | 43 | ||
| Renewable energy accounts for share of energy supply in China (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050) | % | 53.19 | 43 | ||
| Renewable energy accounts for share of energy supply in China (High-emission scenario, 2030) | % | 15.5 | 43 | ||
| Renewable energy accounts for share of energy supply in China (High-emission scenario, 2050) | % | 31.76 | 43 | ||
| Renewable energy share of energy supply in China (Baseline-emission scenario) | % | 18.07 | 53.19 | 44 | |
| Renewable energy share of energy supply in China (High-emission scenario) | % | 15.5 | 31.76 | 44 | |
| Renewable energy share of energy supply in China (Low-emission scenario) | % | 90 | 44 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy cost savings generated by Waste Heat Recovery Heat Pump System at Zhongguancun Yanqing Park (initial 61-day operation phase) | yuan | 1192700 | 17 |
| Natural gas consumption reduced by Waste Heat Recovery Heat Pump System at Zhongguancun Yanqing Park (initial 61-day operation phase) | m³ | 453600 | 17 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Chinese cities covered by BEHL waste-to-energy plants | 14 | 12 | |
| Number of German cities covered by EEW GmbH (BEHL) waste-to-energy plants | 15 | 12 |
Description of the significant climate-related issues which have impacted, and those which may impact, the issuer, and the actions taken to manage them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | 2025 | 2030 | 2050 | 2060 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global average temperature rise since 1850 | degrees Celsius | 1.54 | 23 | ||||
| Global average temperature rise uncertainty | degrees Celsius | 0.06 | 23 | ||||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Baseline-emission scenario, Extremely high risk) | % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Baseline-emission scenario, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.10 | 1.11 | 0.43 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Baseline-emission scenario, High risk) | % | 38.39 | 55.17 | 47.47 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Baseline-emission scenario, Low risk) | % | 1.34 | 2.27 | 14.08 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Baseline-emission scenario, Moderate risk) | % | 60.17 | 41.45 | 38.03 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (High-emission scenario, Extremely high risk) | % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (High-emission scenario, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (High-emission scenario, High risk) | % | 68.49 | 53.88 | 49.25 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (High-emission scenario, Low risk) | % | 1.34 | 1.11 | 12.28 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (High-emission scenario, Moderate risk) | % | 30.08 | 44.69 | 38.04 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Low-emission scenario, Extremely high risk) | % | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Low-emission scenario, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.43 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Low-emission scenario, High risk) | % | 47.23 | 53.40 | 42.47 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Low-emission scenario, Low risk) | % | 11.10 | 12.66 | 9.77 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Heat (Low-emission scenario, Moderate risk) | % | 41.57 | 33.41 | 46.33 | 26 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Baseline-emission scenario - Extremely high risk | % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Baseline-emission scenario - Extremely low risk | % | 44.04 | 51.07 | 39.11 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Baseline-emission scenario - High risk | % | 4.78 | 0.10 | 9.09 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Baseline-emission scenario - Low risk | % | 17.36 | 8.07 | 11.15 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Baseline-emission scenario - Moderate risk | % | 33.82 | 40.76 | 40.55 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - High-emission scenario - Extremely high risk | % | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - High-emission scenario - Extremely low risk | % | 36.62 | 51.83 | 51.83 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - High-emission scenario - High risk | % | 11.60 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - High-emission scenario - Low risk | % | 13.02 | 10.67 | 10.67 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - High-emission scenario - Moderate risk | % | 38.76 | 37.40 | 37.40 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Low-emission scenario - Extremely high risk | % | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Low-emission scenario - Extremely low risk | % | 44.96 | 34.59 | 51.96 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Low-emission scenario - High risk | % | 7.88 | 40.98 | 1.01 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Low-emission scenario - Low risk | % | 8.07 | 10.91 | 46.94 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of Assets Affected by Extreme Precipitation - Low-emission scenario - Moderate risk | % | 39.09 | 13.51 | 0.10 | 28 | ||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2025, Extremely high risk) | % | 0.65 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2025, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.53 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2025, High risk) | % | 49.55 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2025, Low risk) | % | 2.81 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2025, Moderate risk) | % | 46.66 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050, Extremely low risk) | % | 57.85 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050, High risk) | % | 30.83 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050, Low risk) | % | 1.34 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2050, Moderate risk) | % | 9.98 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2060, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.33 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2060, High risk) | % | 45.80 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2060, Low risk) | % | 0.65 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Baseline-emission scenario, 2060, Moderate risk) | % | 53.22 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2025, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.53 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2025, High risk) | % | 45.80 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2025, Low risk) | % | 0.65 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2025, Moderate risk) | % | 53.22 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2050, Extremely low risk) | % | 88.68 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2050, Low risk) | % | 1.34 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2050, Moderate risk) | % | 9.98 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2060, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.33 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2060, High risk) | % | 0.65 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2060, Low risk) | % | 8.77 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (High-emission scenario, 2060, Moderate risk) | % | 90.25 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2025, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.63 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2025, High risk) | % | 46.13 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2025, Low risk) | % | 0.65 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2025, Moderate risk) | % | 53.22 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2050, Extremely low risk) | % | 88.68 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2050, Low risk) | % | 1.34 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2050, Moderate risk) | % | 9.98 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2060, Extremely low risk) | % | 0.63 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2060, High risk) | % | 43.49 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2060, Low risk) | % | 16.34 | 27 | ||||
| Proportion of assets affected by extreme cold (Low-emission scenario, 2060, Moderate risk) | % | 39.55 | 27 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market share of EEW GmbH as the only energy-from-waste plant in Luxembourg | % | 100 | 12 |
| Market share of EEW GmbH in Germany (measured by technical plant capacity) | % | 16 | 12 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market share of EEW GmbH in the Netherlands | % | 6 | 12 |
Focus areas of contribution (e.g. education, environmental concerns, labour needs, health, culture, sport).
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cities covered in Luxembourg and the Netherlands by EEW GmbH (BEHL) | 1 | 12 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct GHG Emissions (Scope 1) | tCO2e | 186659.9 | 221246.9 | 253470.9 |
| Indirect Energy Emissions (Scope 2) | tCO2e | 93016.1 | 98092.9 | 156935.3 |
| Total GHG Emissions | tCO2e | 279676 | 319339.9 | 410406.2 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Reduction in GHG Intensity Compared to Last Year | % | 0.12 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2030 | 2050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Renewable Energy Consumption | % | 15.5 | 90 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption Reduction Compared to Last Year | m³ natural gas | 453600 |