Sustainable Development Report 2020
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|
Total biogenic emissions (Cathay Pacific Group) | tonnes CO2e | 0.01 | 83 |
Total biogenic emissions (Swire Properties) | tonnes CO2e | 79 | 83 |
Trading & Industrial KPI 27 | 0% | 84 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2030 target reduction in GHG emissions (Scope 1 & 2, excluding jet fuel) | % from 2018 baseline | -50 | 24 | |||||
Aviation Division GHG emissions (without jet fuel) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 155 | 23 | |||||
Beverages Division GHG emissions (without jet fuel) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 358 | 23 | |||||
Group GHG emissions | million tonnes CO2e | 8.4 | 23 | |||||
Indirect GHG emissions - Aviation division | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 158 | 157 | 205 | 218 | 204 | 24 | |
Indirect GHG emissions - Beverages division | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 194 | 216 | 148 | 142 | 117 | 24 | |
Indirect GHG emissions - Marine Services division | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 4 | 4 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 24 | |
Indirect GHG emissions - Property division | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 216 | 205 | 275 | 267 | 273 | 24 | |
Indirect GHG emissions - Trading & Industrial division | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 46 | 50 | 37 | 28 | 24 | 24 | |
Marine Services Division GHG emissions (without jet fuel) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 106 | 23 | |||||
Property Division GHG emissions (without jet fuel) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 216 | 23 | |||||
Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions (excluding jet fuel) | % | -50 | 4 | |||||
Total Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions (Aviation) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 7686 | 9 | |||||
Total Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions (Beverages) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 358 | 9 | |||||
Total Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions (Marine Services) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 106 | 9 | |||||
Total Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions (Property) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 216 | 9 | |||||
Total Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions (Trading & Industrial) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 29 | 9 | |||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Cathay Pacific Group) - % Change year-on-year | -59% | 83 | ||||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Cathay Pacific Group) - Direct (Scope 1) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 18430 | 7535 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Cathay Pacific Group) - Indirect (Scope 2), location-based method | thousand tonnes CO2e | 70 | 54 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Cathay Pacific Group) - Total (location-based method) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 18500 | 7589 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (HAECO Group) - % Change year-on-year | -9% | 83 | ||||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (HAECO Group) - Direct (Scope 1) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 35 | 34 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (HAECO Group) - Indirect (Scope 2), location-based method | thousand tonnes CO2e | 72 | 63 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (HAECO Group) - Total (location-based method) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 107 | 97 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Swire Properties) - % Change year-on-year | -6% | 83 | ||||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Swire Properties) - Direct (Scope 1) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 12 | 12 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Swire Properties) - Indirect (Scope 2), location-based method | thousand tonnes CO2e | 218 | 204 | 83 | ||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Swire Properties) - Indirect (Scope 2), market-based method | thousand tonnes CO2e | 191 | 83 | |||||
Total greenhouse gas emissions by weight (Swire Properties) - Total (location-based method) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 230 | 216 | 83 | ||||
Total indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 621 | 24 | |||||
Trading & Industrial Division GHG emissions (without jet fuel) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 29 | 23 | |||||
Trading & Industrial KPI 28 | 15347 | 13257 | 84 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trading & Industrial KPI 29 | 66 | 47 | 84 | |
Waste disposed (Cathay Pacific Group) - Hazardous | tonnes | 44 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (HAECO Group) - Hazardous | tonnes | 1406 | 1248 | 83 |
Waste disposed (Swire Properties) - Hazardous | tonnes | 0.4 | 83 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group total waste recycled | % | 62% | 65% | 86 | |
HUD Group waste recycled | % | 90% | 90% | 86 | |
Swire Coca-Cola waste recycled | % | 74% | 73% | 86 | |
Swire Pacific (Head office) waste recycled | % | 32% | 34% | 86 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore waste recycled | % | 91% | 92% | 86 | |
Total waste generated (Aviation) | tonnes | 17207 | 9 | ||
Total waste generated (Beverages) | tonnes | 30582 | 9 | ||
Total waste generated (Marine Services) | tonnes | 1294 | 9 | ||
Total waste generated (Property) | tonnes | 41442 | 9 | ||
Total waste generated (Trading & Industrial) | tonnes | 811 | 9 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 30 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 84 | ||
Waste disposed (Cathay Pacific Group) - % Change year-on-year | -57% | 83 | |||
Waste disposed (Cathay Pacific Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 21946 | 9338 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (Cathay Pacific Group) - Total | tonnes | 25491 | 10868 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (HAECO Group) - % Change year-on-year | -7% | 83 | |||
Waste disposed (HAECO Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 4434 | 4216 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (HAECO Group) - Total | tonnes | 6811 | 6340 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (Swire Properties) - % Change year-on-year | -15% | 83 | |||
Waste disposed (Swire Properties) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 36810 | 30585 | 83 | |
Waste disposed (Swire Properties) - Total | tonnes | 48883 | 41442 | 83 | |
Waste disposed by Aviation division | tonnes | 14846 | 32 | ||
Waste disposed by Beverages division | tonnes | 5646 | 32 | ||
Waste disposed by Marine Services division | tonnes | 1088 | 32 | ||
Waste disposed by Property division | tonnes | 30585 | 32 | ||
Waste disposed by Trading & Industrial division | tonnes | 302 | 32 | ||
Waste diverted from landfill | % | 55 | 4 | ||
Waste recovered (Cathay Pacific Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 90 | 83 | ||
Waste recovered by Aviation division | tonnes | 90 | 32 | ||
Waste recovered by Beverages division | tonnes | 2592 | 32 | ||
Waste reused (Cathay Pacific Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 516 | 83 | ||
Waste reused (Swire Properties) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 47 | 83 | ||
Waste reused by Aviation division | tonnes | 516 | 32 | ||
Waste reused by Property division | tonnes | 47 | 32 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2050 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2050 target net zero GHG emissions | Net zero | 24 | ||||
GHG emissions reduction achieved by 2020 (compared with a 2015 frozen efficiency baseline) | % | -61 | 20 | |||
GHG emissions reduction target by 2020 (compared with a 2015 frozen efficiency baseline) | % | 8–10 | 20 | |||
Group GHG emissions reduction from 2019 | 57% | 23 | ||||
Group target to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions (excluding jet fuel emissions) by 2030 (compared with a 2018 baseline) | % | -50 | 20 | |||
Swire Coca-Cola Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions reduction target in core operations by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline) | % | -70 | 20 | |||
Swire Coca-Cola value chain (Scope 1, 2, and 3) carbon emissions reduction target by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline) | % | -30 | 20 | |||
Swire Properties Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions intensity reduction target per sqm by 2025 (from a 2018 baseline) | % | -35 | 20 | |||
Swire Properties Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions intensity reduction target per sqm by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline) | % | -52 | 20 | |||
Swire Properties Scope 3 GHG emissions intensity reduction target from capital goods by 2030 (from a 2016-2018 baseline) | % | -25 | 20 | |||
Swire Properties Scope 3 GHG emissions intensity reduction target from downstream leased assets per sqm by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline) | % | -28 | 20 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 31 | -17% | 84 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 | 2050 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target waste diversion from landfill (2020 performance) | 41% | 32 | ||||
Target waste diversion from landfill (2030 target) | 55% | 32 | ||||
Target waste diversion from landfill (2050 target) | Zero waste to landfill | 32 | ||||
Trading & Industrial KPI 32 | 1796 | 1815 | 84 | |||
Trading & Industrial waste recycled | % | 39% | 40% | 86 | ||
Waste recycled (Cathay Pacific Group) - Hazardous | tonnes | 90 | 83 | |||
Waste recycled (Cathay Pacific Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 3545 | 791 | 83 | ||
Waste recycled (HAECO Group) - Hazardous | tonnes | 154 | 83 | |||
Waste recycled (HAECO Group) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 971 | 722 | 83 | ||
Waste recycled (Swire Properties) - Hazardous | tonnes | 0.1 | 83 | |||
Waste recycled (Swire Properties) - Non-hazardous | tonnes | 12073 | 10810 | 83 | ||
Waste recycled by Aviation division | tonnes | 1757 | 32 | |||
Waste recycled by Beverages division | tonnes | 22345 | 32 | |||
Waste recycled by Marine Services division | tonnes | 206 | 32 | |||
Waste recycled by Property division | tonnes | 10810 | 32 | |||
Waste recycled by Trading & Industrial division | tonnes | 509 | 32 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electricity generated from renewable energy sources at Swire Properties, Swire Coca-Cola and HAECO Xiamen in 2020 | kWh | 20000000 | 20 | |
Group total renewable energy as % of total | % | 92% | 90% | 86 |
Group total total energy consumption | 94330 | 86768 | 86 | |
HUD Group renewable energy as % of total | % | 62% | 71% | 86 |
HUD Group total energy consumption | 522 | 414 | 86 | |
On-site renewable energy generation (HAECO Group) | thousands kWh | 1212 | 83 | |
On-site renewable energy generation (Swire Properties) | thousands kWh | 294 | 83 | |
Swire Coca-Cola renewable energy as % of total | % | 99% | 95% | 86 |
Swire Coca-Cola total energy consumption | 30871 | 32846 | 86 | |
Swire Pacific (Head office) renewable energy as % of total | % | 100% | 98% | 86 |
Swire Pacific (Head office) total energy consumption | 38 | 41 | 86 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore renewable energy as % of total | % | 48% | 31% | 86 |
Swire Pacific Offshore total energy consumption | 2544 | 2428 | 86 | |
Total energy consumption (Cathay Pacific Group) - % Change year-on-year | -59% | 83 | ||
Total energy consumption (Cathay Pacific Group) - Direct energy consumption | thousand GJ | 256974 | 105084 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (Cathay Pacific Group) - Indirect energy consumption | thousand GJ | 470 | 371 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (Cathay Pacific Group) - Total | thousand GJ | 257444 | 105455 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (HAECO Group) - % Change year-on-year | -11% | 83 | ||
Total energy consumption (HAECO Group) - Direct energy consumption | thousand GJ | 446 | 402 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (HAECO Group) - Indirect energy consumption | thousand GJ | 498 | 442 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (HAECO Group) - Total | thousand GJ | 944 | 844 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (Swire Properties) - % Change year-on-year | -7% | 83 | ||
Total energy consumption (Swire Properties) - Direct energy consumption | thousand GJ | 204 | 165 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (Swire Properties) - Indirect energy consumption | thousand GJ | 1109 | 1050 | 83 |
Total energy consumption (Swire Properties) - Total | thousand GJ | 1313 | 1215 | 83 |
Trading & Industrial KPI 3 | % | 241 | 1% | 84, 90, 92 |
Trading & Industrial renewable energy as % of total | % | 95% | 83% | 86 |
Trading & Industrial total energy consumption | 6925 | 6311 | 86 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group total water recycled | % | 99% | 97% | 86 | |
HUD Group water recycled | % | 100% | 100% | 86 | |
Overall water use at Swire Properties compared to 2019 | % decrease | 12.5 | 38 | ||
Reduction in water withdrawal from 2015 frozen efficiency baseline | % reduction | 7.5 | 38 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola water recycled | % | 100% | 96% | 86 | |
Swire Coca-Cola water use ratio (litres of water per litre of beverages) | litres/litre | 1.82 | 38 | ||
Swire Pacific (Head office) water recycled | % | 100% | 100% | 86 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore water recycled | % | 100% | 100% | 86 | |
Target reduction in water withdrawal from freshwater sources (from 2018 frozen efficiency baseline) | % reduction | 27 | 38 | ||
Total water withdrawal (Aviation) | thousand cbm | 1036 | 9 | ||
Total water withdrawal (Beverages) | thousand cbm | 14572 | 9 | ||
Total water withdrawal (Marine Services) | thousand cbm | 86 | 9 | ||
Total water withdrawal (Property) | thousand cbm | 1757 | 9 | ||
Total water withdrawal (Trading & Industrial) | thousand cbm | 302 | 9 | ||
Total water withdrawal by sources (Cathay Pacific Group) - % Change year-on-year | -45% | 83 | |||
Total water withdrawal by sources (Cathay Pacific Group) - Total | thousands cbm | 919 | 501 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by sources (Cathay Pacific Group) - Water withdrawal – Municipal | thousands cbm | 919 | 501 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by sources (HAECO Group) - % Change year-on-year | -11% | 83 | |||
Total water withdrawal by sources (HAECO Group) - Total | thousands cbm | 600 | 535 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by sources (HAECO Group) - Water withdrawal – Municipal | thousands cbm | 600 | 535 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by sources (Swire Properties) - % Change year-on-year | -13% | 83 | |||
Total water withdrawal by sources (Swire Properties) - Total | thousands cbm | 2009 | 1757 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by sources (Swire Properties) - Water withdrawal – Municipal | thousands cbm | 2009 | 1757 | 83 | |
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (Cathay Pacific Group) - Low (<20%) | thousands cbm | 501 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (HAECO Group) - High (>40%) | thousands cbm | 22 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (HAECO Group) - Low (<20%) | thousands cbm | 512 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (HAECO Group) - Medium (20–40%) | thousands cbm | 0.9 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (Swire Properties) - High (>40%) | thousands cbm | 656 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (Swire Properties) - Low (<20%) | thousands cbm | 1043 | 83 | ||
Total water withdrawal by water stress levels (Swire Properties) - Medium (20–40%) | thousands cbm | 58 | 83 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 4 | 5.9 | -12% | 84, 90 | ||
Water intensity decrease at Swire Properties Chinese mainland portfolio compared to 2016 | % decrease | 18.5 | 38 | ||
Water intensity decrease at Swire Properties hotels compared to 2016 | % decrease | 32.4 | 38 | ||
Water intensity increase at Swire Properties Hong Kong property portfolio compared to 2016 base year | % increase | 33.1 | 38 | ||
Water use increase at Taikoo Motors | % increase | 7.6 | 38 | ||
Water withdrawal (from 2018 frozen efficiency baseline) | % | -27 | 4 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 5 | 6.1 | 19156 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 6 | 77 | 85 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 7 | 7% | 273 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 8 | 6% | 9% | 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 9 | 2% | 358 | 84, 90 | |
Trading & Industrial KPI 33 | 23.4 | 27.37 | 84 |
Description of whether there is any issue in sourcing water that is fit for purpose, water efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2050 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target for water neutrality | Water neutrality | 38 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 34 | 17% | 84 | |||
Trading & Industrial water recycled | % | 92% | 93% | 86 | |
Water use decrease at Cathay Pacific | % decrease | 45 | 38 | ||
Water use decrease at HAECO | % decrease | 11 | 38 | ||
Water use decrease in Trading & Industrial division | % decrease | 7 | 38 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trading & Industrial KPI 5 | 4.6 | 6.9 | 90 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trading & Industrial KPI 6 | 7 | 6.3 | 84, 90 |
Description of the significant climate-related issues which have impacted, and those which may impact, the issuer, and the actions taken to manage them.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trading & Industrial KPI 7 | 6% | 2% | 84, 90 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2024 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average staff tenure | years | 8.4 | 75 | ||
Average tenure of employee - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 10.7 | 10.1 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | years | 11.6 | 12 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | years | 5.3 | 5.5 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 12.3 | 12.5 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Female - HAECO Group | years | 12.2 | 9.5 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Female - Swire Properties | years | 4.5 | 5 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 8.5 | 8.4 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Male - HAECO Group | years | 10.3 | 11.9 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Male - Swire Properties | years | 5.6 | 5.8 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 16.7 | 16.3 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | years | 17.7 | 18.4 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | years | 9.6 | 9.7 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 2.7 | 3 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Under 30 years old - HAECO Group | years | 2.9 | 3.4 | 89 | |
Average tenure of employee - Under 30 years old - Swire Properties | years | 1.8 | 1.9 | 89 | |
Employee new hire - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 5 | 3 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 7 | 3 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 21 | 14 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Chinese mainland - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 8 | 6 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Chinese mainland - HAECO Group | % | 8 | 2 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Chinese mainland - Swire Properties | % | 29 | 21 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 7 | 2 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Female - HAECO Group | % | 15 | 4 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Female - Swire Properties | % | 32 | 19 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Hong Kong & Macau - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 7 | 4 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Hong Kong & Macau - HAECO Group | % | 13 | 3 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Hong Kong & Macau - Swire Properties | % | 24 | 14 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 11 | 6 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Male - HAECO Group | % | 13 | 5 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Male - Swire Properties | % | 25 | 18 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Others - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 10 | 5 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Others - HAECO Group | % | 20 | 20 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 6 | 6 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 6 | 3 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 16 | 9 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Taiwan - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 1 | 87 | ||
Employee new hire - USA - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 10 | 7 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - USA - HAECO Group | % | 25 | 15 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - USA - Swire Properties | % | 45 | 35 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 28 | 7 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 32 | 10 | 87 | |
Employee new hire - Under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 52 | 36 | 87 | |
Employees who are on Permanent Terms (%) - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 85 | 85 | 85 | |
Employees who are on Permanent Terms (%) - HAECO Group | % | 95 | 96 | 85 | |
Employees who are on Permanent Terms (%) - Swire Properties | % | 94 | 92 | 85 | |
Group total (2019) | % | 38 | 88 | ||
Group total (2020) | % | 36 | 88 | ||
Group total Financial KPI 1 | $ | 50471 | 8902 | 90 | |
Group total Financial KPI 2 | $ | 5656 | 90 | ||
Group total Financial KPI 3 | $ | 2404 | 90 | ||
Group total Financial KPI 4 | $ | 1361 | 90 | ||
Group total KPI 1 | % | 260234 | 108144 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 10 | % | 9% | -18% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 11 | % | -44% | -19% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 12 | 8% | 7% | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 13 | 84% | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 14 | 18335 | 17753 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 15 | 65% | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 16 | 11053 | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 17 | 2718 | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 18 | 3982 | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 19 | 68% | 84, 90 | |||
Group total KPI 2 | % | 8.7 | 2% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 20 | 3333 | 226.5 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 21 | 60.6 | 49842 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 22 | 48.3 | 4687 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 23 | 45.7 | 30938 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 24 | 40.8 | 34.2 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 25 | 28.9 | 28.4 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 26 | 112288 | 91336 | 84, 90 | ||
Group total KPI 27 | -19% | 84 | |||
Group total KPI 28 | 214131 | 169515 | 84 | ||
Group total KPI 29 | 2151 | 706 | 84 | ||
Group total KPI 3 | % | 2% | 112052 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 30 | 2.01 | 0.83 | 84 | ||
Group total KPI 31 | -59% | 84 | |||
Group total KPI 32 | 69150 | 44420 | 84 | ||
Group total KPI 33 | 64.59 | 52.41 | 84 | ||
Group total KPI 34 | -19% | 84 | |||
Group total KPI 35 | 2 | 84 | |||
Group total KPI 4 | % | -13% | 8.3 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 5 | % | 8.9 | -30% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 6 | % | 8.3 | -17% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 7 | % | 12% | 13% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 8 | % | 8% | 191 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total KPI 9 | % | 3% | 2% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Group total women in management | % | 38% | 35% | 86 | |
HUD Group (2019) | % | 88 | 88 | ||
HUD Group (2020) | % | 88 | 88 | ||
HUD Group KPI 1 | % | 342 | 314 | 84, 90, 92 | |
HUD Group KPI 12 | 5% | 5% | 84, 90 | ||
HUD Group KPI 14 | 81 | 86 | 84 | ||
HUD Group KPI 15 | 6% | 84, 90 | |||
HUD Group KPI 16 | 96% | 84, 90 | |||
HUD Group KPI 2 | % | 16 | 17 | 84, 90, 92 | |
HUD Group KPI 3 | % | 2% | 14.7 | 84, 90, 92 | |
HUD Group KPI 4 | 9.3 | -8% | 84, 90 | ||
HUD Group KPI 6 | 9.3 | 26 | 84, 90 | ||
HUD Group KPI 7 | 5% | 2.3 | 84, 90 | ||
HUD Group KPI 9 | 3% | 29 | 84, 90 | ||
HUD Group women in management | % | 10% | 10% | 86 | |
Individual Contributor - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 61 | 58 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor - Female - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 19 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor - Female - Swire Properties | % | 37 | 36 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 39 | 42 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor - Male - HAECO Group | % | 82 | 81 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor - Male - Swire Properties | % | 63 | 64 | 87 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 64 | 63 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 54 | 56 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 50 | 52 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 16 | 18 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 19 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 21 | 22 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 19 | 18 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 29 | 25 | 85 | |
Individual Contributor by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 29 | 26 | 85 | |
New hires by region - Chinese mainland | % | 13 | 75 | ||
New hires by region - Hong Kong & Macau | % | 9 | 75 | ||
New hires by region - Others | % | 5 | 75 | ||
New hires by region - Taiwan | % | 11 | 75 | ||
New hires by region - USA | % | 19 | 75 | ||
Operational Leader - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 16 | 13 | 87 | |
Operational Leader - Female - HAECO Group | % | 21 | 23 | 87 | |
Operational Leader - Female - Swire Properties | % | 51 | 52 | 87 | |
Operational Leader - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 84 | 87 | 87 | |
Operational Leader - Male - HAECO Group | % | 79 | 77 | 87 | |
Operational Leader - Male - Swire Properties | % | 49 | 48 | 87 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 76 | 70 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 63 | 68 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 82 | 81 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 19 | 28 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 36 | 31 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 16 | 17 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 5 | 2 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 1 | 1 | 85 | |
Operational Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 2 | 2 | 85 | |
Permanent employees who work Full-time (%) - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 99 | 99 | 85 | |
Permanent employees who work Full-time (%) - HAECO Group | % | 99 | 99 | 85 | |
Permanent employees who work Full-time (%) - Swire Properties | % | 98 | 98 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 58 | 59 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 55 | 58 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 54 | 56 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 18 | 21 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 22 | 22 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 20 | 21 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 24 | 20 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 23 | 20 | 85 | |
Staff by age group (%) - Under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 25 | 23 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Individual Contributor - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 71 | 68 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Individual Contributor - HAECO Group | % | 79 | 84 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Individual Contributor - Swire Properties | % | 75 | 74 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Operational Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 16 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Operational Leader - HAECO Group | % | 3 | 2 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Operational Leader - Swire Properties | % | 8 | 9 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Strategic Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 5 | 0.3 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Strategic Leader - HAECO Group | % | 1 | 1 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Strategic Leader - Swire Properties | % | 1 | 1 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Team Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 13 | 15 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Team Leader - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 13 | 85 | |
Staff by employee category (%) - Team Leader - Swire Properties | % | 16 | 17 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 55 | 50 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Female - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 18 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Female - Swire Properties | % | 41 | 40 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 45 | 50 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Male - HAECO Group | % | 82 | 82 | 85 | |
Staff by gender (%) - Male - Swire Properties | % | 59 | 60 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Chinese mainland - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 2 | 1 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Chinese mainland - HAECO Group | % | 36 | 38 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Chinese mainland - Swire Properties | % | 42 | 43 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Hong Kong & Macau - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 84 | 85 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Hong Kong & Macau - HAECO Group | % | 48 | 47 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Hong Kong & Macau - Swire Properties | % | 50 | 51 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Others - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 10 | 11 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - Taiwan - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 2 | 2 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - USA - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 2 | 1 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - USA - HAECO Group | % | 16 | 16 | 85 | |
Staff by region (%) - USA - Swire Properties | % | 8 | 5 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 7 | 24 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader - Female - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 18 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader - Female - Swire Properties | % | 47 | 46 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 93 | 76 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader - Male - HAECO Group | % | 82 | 82 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader - Male - Swire Properties | % | 53 | 54 | 87 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 57 | 45 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 67 | 28 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 57 | 52 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 43 | 55 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 27 | 72 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 43 | 48 | 85 | |
Strategic Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 6 | 85 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola women in management | % | 26% | 27% | 86 | |
Swire Pacific (Head office) (2019) | % | 71 | 88 | ||
Swire Pacific (Head office) (2020) | % | 27 | 88 | ||
Swire Pacific (Head office) women in management | % | 68% | 66% | 86 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 1 | % | 1037 | 3.9 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 10 | 5% | 5% | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 2 | % | 5 | 1% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 20 | 1665 | 5.3 | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 3 | % | 1042 | 1% | 84, 90, 92 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 6 | 8.4 | 77 | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 7 | 0.4 | 6% | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Pacific Offshore women in management | % | 9% | 8% | 86 | |
Team Leader - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 47 | 43 | 87 | |
Team Leader - Female - HAECO Group | % | 23 | 19 | 87 | |
Team Leader - Female - Swire Properties | % | 53 | 53 | 87 | |
Team Leader - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 53 | 57 | 87 | |
Team Leader - Male - HAECO Group | % | 77 | 81 | 87 | |
Team Leader - Male - Swire Properties | % | 47 | 47 | 87 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 54 | 58 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 64 | 75 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 72 | 73 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 28 | 27 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 26 | 22 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 6 | 6 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 17 | 16 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 9 | 2 | 85 | |
Team Leader by age group (%) - under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 23 | 21 | 85 | |
Thousand hours worked (Cathay Pacific Group) | thousand hours | 68757 | 30744 | 83 | |
Thousand hours worked (HAECO Group) | thousand hours | 34962 | 31037 | 83 | |
Thousand hours worked (Swire Properties) | thousand hours | 13741 | 13141 | 83 | |
Total average tenure of employee - Cathay Pacific Group | years | 10.6 | 10.2 | 89 | |
Total average tenure of employee - HAECO Group | years | 10.7 | 11.4 | 89 | |
Total average tenure of employee - Swire Properties | years | 5.2 | 5.5 | 89 | |
Total employees (Aviation) | 38394 | 9 | |||
Total employees (Beverages) | 32846 | 9 | |||
Total employees (Marine Services) | 2842 | 9 | |||
Total employees (Property) | 6334 | 9 | |||
Total employees (Trading & Industrial) | 6311 | 9 | |||
Total staff (all employment types) - Cathay Pacific Group | 31778 | 24051 | 85 | ||
Total staff (all employment types) - HAECO Group | 15187 | 14343 | 85 | ||
Total staff (all employment types) - Swire Properties | 6465 | 6334 | 85 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 1 | % | 1% | 72 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Trading & Industrial KPI 10 | 2% | 5% | 84, 90 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 12 | 324 | 302 | 84, 90 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 14 | 324 | 302 | 84, 90 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 15 | 79% | 84, 90 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 16 | 301 | 84, 90 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 18 | 1 | 84, 90 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 2 | % | 6 | 7.1 | 84, 90, 92 | |
Trading & Industrial KPI 20 | 0.7 | 84 | 84, 90 | ||
Trading & Industrial KPI 8 | 3% | 1% | 90 | ||
Trading & Industrial women in management | % | 61% | 60% | 86 | |
Women in senior management roles | % | 30 | 4 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jobs reduced due to Cathay Pacific restructuring | jobs | 5900 | 75 | ||||
New hire rate | % | 12 | 75 | ||||
Total employee promotion rate - Cathay Pacific Group | 8% | 3% | 89 | ||||
Total employee promotion rate - HAECO Group | 16% | 12% | 89 | ||||
Total employee promotion rate - Swire Properties | 12% | 7% | 89 | ||||
Total new hires rate - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 4 | 87 | |||
Total new hires rate - HAECO Group | % | 13 | 4 | 87 | |||
Total new hires rate - Swire Properties | % | 28 | 18 | 87 | |||
Total voluntary turnover rate of permanent employees | % | 15 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 75 |
Total voluntary turnover rate of permanent employees - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 10 | 87 | |||
Total voluntary turnover rate of permanent employees - HAECO Group | % | 9 | 6 | 87 | |||
Total voluntary turnover rate of permanent employees - Swire Properties | % | 21 | 14 | 87 | |||
Trading & Industrial KPI 9 | 2% | 29 | 84, 90 | ||||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 7 | 8 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 6 | 4 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 17 | 11 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Chinese mainland - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 7 | 3 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Chinese mainland - HAECO Group | % | 5 | 3 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Chinese mainland - Swire Properties | % | 21 | 16 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 10 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Female - HAECO Group | % | 10 | 6 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Female - Swire Properties | % | 23 | 15 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Hong Kong & Macau - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 10 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Hong Kong & Macau - HAECO Group | % | 8 | 5 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Hong Kong & Macau - Swire Properties | % | 20 | 10 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 11 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Male - HAECO Group | % | 8 | 6 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Male - Swire Properties | % | 19 | 12 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Others - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 8 | 7 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Others - HAECO Group | % | 12 | 13 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 11 | 16 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | % | 7 | 4 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | % | 13 | 6 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Taiwan - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 6 | 20 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - USA - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 9 | 6 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - USA - HAECO Group | % | 18 | 13 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - USA - Swire Properties | % | 26 | 20 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | % | 17 | 12 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Under 30 years old - HAECO Group | % | 17 | 11 | 87 | |||
Voluntary permanent employee turnover - Under 30 years old - Swire Properties | % | 34 | 25 | 87 | |||
Voluntary turnover rate for permanent employees - Female | % | 16 | 21 | 21 | 18 | 14 | 75 |
Voluntary turnover rate for permanent employees - Male | % | 14 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 75 |
Voluntary turnover rate for permanent staff | % | 16 | 14 | 75 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Employee fatalities | 1 | 50 | ||
Total fatalities (employee) (Cathay Pacific Group) | 1 | 83 | ||
Total lost time injuries (Cathay Pacific Group) | 1560 | 269 | 83 | |
Total lost time injuries (HAECO Group) | 198 | 127 | 83 | |
Total lost time injuries (Swire Properties) | 112 | 82 | 83 |
Lost days due to work injury.
Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lost Day Rate (Cathay Pacific Group) | 128.56 | 163.14 | 83 | ||||
Lost Day Rate (HAECO Group) | 43.32 | 38.32 | 83 | ||||
Lost Day Rate (Swire Properties) | 43.33 | 48.82 | 83 | ||||
Lost Day Rate (number of days lost per 100 full-time equivalent employees) | 46.8 | 59.4 | 52.1 | 64.6 | 52.4 | 50 | |
Lost Day Rate - % Change year-on-year (Cathay Pacific Group) | 27% | 83 | |||||
Lost Day Rate - % Change year-on-year (HAECO Group) | -12% | 83 | |||||
Lost Day Rate - % Change year-on-year (Swire Properties) | 13% | 83 | |||||
Lost Time Injury Rate (Cathay Pacific Group) | 4.54 | 1.75 | 83 | ||||
Lost Time Injury Rate (HAECO Group) | 1.13 | 0.82 | 83 | ||||
Lost Time Injury Rate (Swire Properties) | 1.63 | 1.25 | 83 | ||||
Lost Time Injury Rate (number of injuries per 100 full-time equivalent employees) | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2 | 0.8 | 50 | |
Lost Time Injury Rate - % Change year-on-year (Cathay Pacific Group) | -61% | 83 | |||||
Lost Time Injury Rate - % Change year-on-year (HAECO Group) | -27% | 83 | |||||
Lost Time Injury Rate - % Change year-on-year (Swire Properties) | -23% | 83 | |||||
Lost days due to injuries (Cathay Pacific Group) | 44496 | 25078 | 83 | ||||
Lost days due to injuries (HAECO Group) | 7573 | 5947 | 83 | ||||
Lost days due to injuries (Swire Properties) | 2977 | 3208 | 83 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 8 | 7% | 6% | 90 | |
Swire Pacific Offshore KPI 9 | 1% | 3% | 84, 90 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Employee promotion rate - 30 to 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | 9% | 3% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - 30 to 50 years old - HAECO Group | 14% | 7% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - 30 to 50 years old - Swire Properties | 11% | 6% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | 7% | 2% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Female - HAECO Group | 14% | 11% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Female - Swire Properties | 13% | 8% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | 8% | 4% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Male - HAECO Group | 16% | 12% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Male - Swire Properties | 12% | 6% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Over 50 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | 3% | 1% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Over 50 years old - HAECO Group | 6% | 2% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Over 50 years old - Swire Properties | 4% | 2% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Under 30 years old - Cathay Pacific Group | 6% | 6% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Under 30 years old - HAECO Group | 28% | 34% | 89 | |
Employee promotion rate - Under 30 years old - Swire Properties | 20% | 13% | 89 | |
Employees trained - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | 100% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Female - HAECO Group | 95% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Female - Swire Properties | 97% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Individual Contributor - Cathay Pacific Group | 99% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Individual Contributor - HAECO Group | 95% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Individual Contributor - Swire Properties | 96% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | 98% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Male - HAECO Group | 94% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Male - Swire Properties | 96% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Operational Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | 99% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Operational Leader - HAECO Group | 89% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Operational Leader - Swire Properties | 97% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Strategic Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | 93% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Strategic Leader - HAECO Group | 86% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Strategic Leader - Swire Properties | 94% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Team Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | 98% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Team Leader - HAECO Group | 92% | 89 | ||
Employees trained - Team Leader - Swire Properties | 99% | 89 | ||
Total employees trained - Cathay Pacific Group | 99% | 89 | ||
Total employees trained - HAECO Group | 94% | 89 | ||
Total employees trained - Swire Properties | 97% | 89 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Average employee training hours - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 25.1 | 33.9 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Female - HAECO Group | hours | 33.1 | 33.9 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Female - Swire Properties | hours | 32.7 | 21.8 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Individual Contributor - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 74.1 | 32.7 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Individual Contributor - HAECO Group | hours | 62.1 | 51.4 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Individual Contributor - Swire Properties | hours | 27.4 | 19.3 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 50.8 | 39.1 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Male - HAECO Group | hours | 61.2 | 57.7 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Male - Swire Properties | hours | 24.8 | 17.9 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Operational Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 93.8 | 28 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Operational Leader - HAECO Group | hours | 20.8 | 18.7 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Operational Leader - Swire Properties | hours | 38.4 | 23.3 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Strategic Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 86 | 846 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Strategic Leader - HAECO Group | hours | 27.6 | 8.2 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Strategic Leader - Swire Properties | hours | 53.2 | 15.7 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Team Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 68.9 | 43.2 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Team Leader - HAECO Group | hours | 33.8 | 72.7 | 89 |
Average employee training hours - Team Leader - Swire Properties | hours | 24 | 18.5 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Female - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 265 | 22025 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Female - HAECO Group | HK$ | 3107 | 2689 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Female - Swire Properties | HK$ | 445 | 1007 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Individual Contributor - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 24 | 17307 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Individual Contributor - HAECO Group | HK$ | 5494 | 4546 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Individual Contributor - Swire Properties | HK$ | 346 | 265 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Male - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 997 | 17733 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Male - HAECO Group | HK$ | 4337 | 4433 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Male - Swire Properties | HK$ | 449 | 650 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Operational Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 3594 | 26148 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Operational Leader - HAECO Group | HK$ | 2076 | 1071 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Operational Leader - Swire Properties | HK$ | 7913 | 3890 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Strategic Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 21015 | 89 | |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Strategic Leader - HAECO Group | HK$ | 1242 | 888 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Strategic Leader - Swire Properties | HK$ | 16531 | 2277 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Team Leader - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 1708 | 23173 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Team Leader - HAECO Group | HK$ | 2297 | 1729 | 89 |
Average employee training spend (HK$) - Team Leader - Swire Properties | HK$ | 1443 | 1306 | 89 |
Total average hours of training (per employee) - Cathay Pacific Group | hours | 70.2 | 36.6 | 89 |
Total average hours of training (per employee) - HAECO Group | hours | 55.9 | 53.3 | 89 |
Total average hours of training (per employee) - Swire Properties | hours | 28 | 19.5 | 89 |
Total average spend on training (per employee) - Cathay Pacific Group | HK$ | 147 | 19860 | 89 |
Total average spend on training (per employee) - HAECO Group | HK$ | 4103 | 4107 | 89 |
Total average spend on training (per employee) - Swire Properties | HK$ | 447 | 794 | 89 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Recurring profit/(loss) (Aviation) | HK$M | -6033 | 9 | |
Recurring profit/(loss) (Beverages) | HK$M | 2076 | 9 | |
Recurring profit/(loss) (Marine Services) | HK$M | -1019 | 9 | |
Recurring profit/(loss) (Property) | HK$M | 5834 | 9 | |
Recurring profit/(loss) (Trading & Industrial) | HK$M | 12 | 9 | |
Swire Coca-Cola (2019) | % | 73 | 88 | |
Swire Coca-Cola (2020) | % | 28 | 88 | |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 1 | $ | 61620 | 13515 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 2 | $ | 4787 | 2631 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 3 | $ | 2978 | 1786 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 4 | $ | 516 | 1175 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 5 | $ | 1564 | 1338 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 6 | $ | 1863 | 1460 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola Financial KPI 7 | $ | 1642 | 1370 | 90 |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 1 | % | 1% | 1% | 84, 90, 92 |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 10 | -3% | 9% | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 11 | 6% | 0.08 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 12 | 6% | 14382 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 13 | 82% | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 14 | 14402 | 14572 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 15 | 1% | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 16 | 8610 | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 17 | 2659 | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 18 | 3303 | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 19 | 34% | 84, 90 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 2 | % | 7.1 | 1% | 84, 90, 92 |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 20 | 261 | 8.88 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 21 | 43.9 | 5485 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 22 | 55.7 | 4442 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 23 | 20330 | 17903 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 24 | 29.3 | 27.1 | 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 25 | 32.3 | 30.5 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 26 | 28387 | 30582 | 84, 90 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 27 | -35% | 8% | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 28 | 67816 | 69271 | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 29 | 200 | 174 | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 3 | % | 12.4 | 1% | 84, 90, 92 |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 30 | 0.59 | 0.5 | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 31 | -15% | 84 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 32 | 10784 | 7734 | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 33 | 31.8 | 22.33 | 84 | |
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 34 | -30% | 84 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 35 | 1 | 84 | ||
Swire Coca-Cola KPI 4 | 6.7 | 2% | 84, 90 | |
Total revenue (Aviation) | HK$M | 11483 | 9 | |
Total revenue (Beverages) | HK$M | 45082 | 9 | |
Total revenue (Marine Services) | HK$M | 1890 | 9 | |
Total revenue (Property) | HK$M | 13308 | 9 | |
Total revenue (Trading & Industrial) | HK$M | 8367 | 9 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group total Financial KPI 5 | $ | 2042 | 90 | |
Group total Financial KPI 6 | $ | 1409 | 90 | |
Group total Financial KPI 7 | $ | 2347 | 90 | |
Swire Pacific (Head office) Financial KPI 5 | $ | 55384 | 90 | |
Swire Pacific (Head office) Financial KPI 6 | $ | 8888 | 15 | 90 |
Swire Pacific (Head office) Financial KPI 7 | $ | 6579 | 135 | 90 |
Swire Pacific Offshore Financial KPI 6 | $ | 432 | 69 | 90 |
Swire Pacific Offshore Financial KPI 7 | $ | 28897 | 7329 | 90 |
Tax paid (Aviation) | HK$M | 175 | 9 | |
Tax paid (Beverages) | HK$M | 476 | 9 | |
Tax paid (Marine Services) | HK$M | 21 | 9 | |
Tax paid (Property) | HK$M | 1589 | 9 | |
Tax paid (Trading & Industrial) | HK$M | 52 | 9 | |
Trading & Industrial Financial KPI 5 | $ | 446 | 168 | 90 |
Trading & Industrial Financial KPI 6 | $ | 281 | 62 | 90 |
Trading & Industrial Financial KPI 7 | $ | 344 | 105 | 90 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct GHG Emissions (Scope 1) | thousand tonnes CO2e | 18430 | 7535 | ||||
Indirect Energy Emissions (Scope 2) | thousand tonnes of CO2e | 618 | 632 | 667.8 | 697 | 621 | |
Total GHG Emissions | million tonnes CO2e | 18500 | 8.4 | -50 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Hazardous Waste Disposed | tonnes | 1406.4 | 1292 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diversion Rate of Non-Hazardous Waste | % | 55 | ||
Non-Hazardous Waste Disposed | tonnes | 36810 | 30585 | |
Non-Hazardous Waste Reused | tonnes | 47 | ||
Recycling Rate of Non-Hazardous Waste | % | 62 | 65 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 | 2030 |
---|---|---|---|
GHG Emissions Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % | 57 | |
Target Reduction in GHG Intensity Percentage by 2030 Compared to 2018 | % | 52 | |
Target Scope 1 and 2 Emissions Reduction Percentage by 2030 Compared to 2018 | % | 50 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|
Target Hazardous Waste Intensity Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % | 55 | 100 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of Renewable Energy Consumption | % | 92 | 90 |
Total Direct Energy Consumption | thousand GJ | 204 | 402 |
Total Energy Consumption | thousand GJ | 1313 | 105455 |
Total Indirect Energy Consumption | thousand GJ | 470 | 1050 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Municipal Water Consumption | thousand cbm | 2009 | 535 |
Recycled Water Percentage | % | 100 | 97 |
Total Water Withdrawal | thousand cbm | 2009 | 302 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Electricity Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | 6.5 | 7 | |
Electricity Usage Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % | 6 | 9 |
Energy Consumption Reduction Compared to Last Year | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
Energy Consumption Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % | 6 | 9 |
Investment in Energy-saving and Emission-reduction Technology Transformation | 23.4 | 27.37 | |
Number of Energy-saving and Carbon Reduction Demonstration Projects Achieved | 344 | 358 | |
Steam Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | 267 | 273 | |
Steam Usage Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % | 2 | 12 |
Description of whether there is any issue in sourcing water that is fit for purpose, water efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Target Water Consumption Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % decrease | 45 |
Water Consumption Reduction Percentage Compared to Last Year | % decrease | 7 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Total Investment in Ecological Restoration | 12.1 | 11.3 |
Description of the significant climate-related issues which have impacted, and those which may impact, the issuer, and the actions taken to manage them.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of Funds Used to Implement Climate Projects | % | 6 | 2 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Total Employees | 53430 | 77927 | ||
Percentage of Employees Aged 30-50 | % | 58 | 59 | |
Percentage of Employees Aged Above 50 | % | 18 | 21 | |
Percentage of Employees Aged Below 30 | % | 24 | 20 | |
Percentage of Employees in Hong Kong | % | 84 | 85 | |
Percentage of Employees in Mainland China | % | 2 | 1 | |
Percentage of Employees in Overseas | % | 10 | 11 | |
Percentage of Employees in Taiwan | % | 2 | 2 | |
Percentage of Employees in United States | % | 2 | 1 | |
Percentage of Female Employees | % | 55 | 50 | |
Percentage of Full-time Employees | % | 99 | 99 | |
Percentage of Male Employees | % | 45 | 50 | |
Percentage of New Employees | % | 2 | 2 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Above 50) | % | 6 | 6 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Aged 30-50) | % | 5 | 3 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Aged Below 30) | % | 28 | 7 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Female) | % | 7 | 2 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Hong Kong) | % | 7 | 4 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Mainland China) | % | 8 | 6 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Male) | % | 11 | 6 | |
Percentage of New Employees (Overseas) | % | 10 | 5 | |
Percentage of Senior Management Employees | % | 30 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnover Rate of Employees Aged 30-50 | % | 10 | 7.666666666666667 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees Aged Above 50 | % | 10.333333333333334 | 8.666666666666666 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees Aged Below 30 | % | 22.666666666666668 | 16 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees in Hong Kong | % | 12.333333333333334 | 8.333333333333334 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees in Macau | % | 12.333333333333334 | 8.333333333333334 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees in Mainland China | % | 11 | 7.333333333333333 | |||
Turnover Rate of Employees in United States | % | 17.666666666666668 | 13 | |||
Turnover Rate of Female Employees | % | 16 | 21 | 21 | 18 | 14 |
Turnover Rate of Male Employees | % | 14 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 14 |
Turnover Rate of Total Employees | % | 15 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 14 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Number of Fatalities as a Result of Work-related Injuries | 1 | |
Number of Work-related Fatalities | 1 |
Lost days due to work injury.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lost Days Due to Work-related Injuries | days | 55046 | 34233 | |||
Rate of Work-related Injuries | per 100 employees | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2 | 0.8 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Production Safety Emergency Drills | 79 | 77 | |
Participation Rate of Safety Training | % | 7 | 6 |
Percentage of Employees Covered by Safety Drills | % | 1 | 3 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Employees Trained | % | 94 |
Percentage of Trained Female Employees | % | 95 |
Percentage of Trained Male Employees | % | 96 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Average Training Hours (Female) | hours | 32.7 | 33.9 |
Average Training Hours (Male) | hours | 24.8 | 17.9 |
Average Training Hours per Employee | hours | 55.9 | 19.5 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Complaint Growth Rate | % | 1% | 1% |
Total Number of Customer Complaints | 1149 | 1176 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
---|---|---|
Total Social Investment | $ | 2042 |