2020 Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust emissions, Nanchang Yadong (cement grinding) | ton | 3.9 | 40 | ||
| Dust emissions, Wuhan Yadong (cement grinding) | ton | 40.83 | 40 | ||
| Dust emissions, Yangzhou Yadong (cement grinding) | ton | 42.6 | 40 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.65 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 8 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 32 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 17.5 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.39 | 37 | ||
| Huzhou Yadong - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.16 | 37 | |||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1.05 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 10 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 11.05 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 36.25 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 16 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.28 | 37 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.42 | 37 | |||
| Median error of displacement of slope displacement observation piles | mm | 1 | 100 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 9.23 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 10 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 18.2 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 72 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 15 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.41 | 37 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.74 | 37 | |||
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton, tons | 613.6 | 601.3 | 516.6 | 39, 40 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton, tons | 1064 | 734.8 | 548.3 | 39, 40 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton, tons | 5447 | 5171 | 7265.6 | 39, 40 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton, tons | 953 | 724.8 | 743.2 | 39, 40 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton, tons | 1073 | 722.7 | 576.9 | 39, 40 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton, tons | 453.8 | 484.4 | 382 | 39, 40 |
| Noise levels compliance with Grade II limit of Emission Standard for Industrial Enterprises Noise at Boundary (GB 12348) | Complies | 100 | |||
| Particles average emission concentration, Huanggang Yadong, Dust | mg/m³ | 12.3 | 7.8 | 10.3 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Huanggang Yadong, Soot | mg/m³ | 8.4 | 7.2 | 10.2 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Hubei Yadong, Dust | mg/m³ | 5.2 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Hubei Yadong, Soot | mg/m³ | 8.6 | 9.1 | 7.3 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Jiangxi Yadong, Dust | mg/m³ | 14.3 | 6 | 4.3 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Jiangxi Yadong, Soot | mg/m³ | 16.9 | 9 | 6.8 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Sichuan Lanfeng, Dust | mg/m³ | 2 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Sichuan Lanfeng, Soot | mg/m³ | 8 | 6.8 | 4 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Sichuan Yadong, Dust | mg/m³ | 3 | 5 | 3.9 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Sichuan Yadong, Soot | mg/m³ | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Wuhan Yaxin, Dust | mg/m³ | 6.9 | 7.6 | 7 | 40 |
| Particles average emission concentration, Wuhan Yaxin, Soot | mg/m³ | 4.7 | 6.3 | 5 | 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton, tons | 39.3 | 27.7 | 23.6 | 39, 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton, tons | 90 | 85.8 | 45 | 39, 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton, tons | 257 | 257.4 | 246.7 | 39, 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton, tons | 81 | 91 | 69.7 | 39, 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton, tons | 71.4 | 78.8 | 76.5 | 39, 40 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton, tons | 21.9 | 31.5 | 21.3 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Huanggang Yadong | ton, tons | 43 | 50.7 | 64.1 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Hubei Yadong | ton, tons | 88 | 137.8 | 114.1 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Jiangxi Yadong | ton, tons | 1368 | 1273.7 | 673.3 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Sichuan Lanfeng | ton, tons | 53 | 80 | 77.4 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Sichuan Yadong | ton, tons | 49.1 | 34.5 | 4.5 | 39, 40 |
| SO2 emissions, Wuhan Yaxin | ton, tons | 19.6 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 39, 40 |
| Sichuan Lafarge - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.12 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 4.32 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 30.9 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 14.2 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.05 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Lafarge - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.44 | 37 | |||
| Sichuan Yadong - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 2.5 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 2.5 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 18 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.06 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 13 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.36 | 37 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.04 | 37 | |||
| Waste levels compliance with Emission Standard of Air Pollutants for Cement Industry (GB 4915) | Complies | 100 | |||
| Yangchun Yadong - Ammonia nitrogen (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 4.7 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Animal and vegetable oils (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 10 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Biological oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 19.4 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Chemical oxygen demand (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 92 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Oil type (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Suspended solids (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 23 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - Total phosphorus (average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.54 | 37 | ||
| Yangchun Yadong - pH (average value of measurement) | 7.63 | 37 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions intensity of CO2 (Asia Cement China) | 0.884 | 0.872 | 0.876 | 31 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Huanggang Yadong | 0.904 | 0.934 | 0.9 | 30 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Hubei Yadong | 0.958 | 0.824 | 0.866 | 30 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Hubei Yadong #1 | 0.87 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Hubei Yadong #2 | 0.861 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong | 0.863 | 0.87 | 0.874 | 30 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #1 | 0.87 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #2 | 0.872 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #3 | 0.87 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #4 | 0.867 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #5 | 0.877 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #6 | 0.883 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng | 0.871 | 0.871 | 0.873 | 30 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng #1 | 0.877 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng #2 | 0.87 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Yadong | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.878 | 30 | ||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #1 | 0.88 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #2 | 0.883 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #3 | 0.872 | 30 | ||||
| Emissions intensity of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin | 0.938 | 0.933 | 0.914 | 30 | ||
| GHG emission intensity (CO2) | 0.88 | 9 | ||||
| Reduction in cement emission intensity by 2030 | reduction | 20% | 69 | |||
| Total emission of CO2 (Asia Cement China) | 0000 tons | 2192.5 | 2165 | 2095.3 | 31 | |
| Total emission of CO2, Huanggang Yadong | 10000 tons | 127.93 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 134.89 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 120.13 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 137.59 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 134.66 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #3 | 10000 tons | 140.38 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #4 | 10000 tons | 146.57 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #5 | 10000 tons | 218.76 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong #6 | 10000 tons | 204.05 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng #1 | 10000 tons | 135.22 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng #2 | 10000 tons | 154.8 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 121.5 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 124.9 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong #3 | 10000 tons | 126.34 | 30 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 67.56 | 30 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel rods produced from solid waste for cement kilns | tons | 17518.7 | 9 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Phosphogypsum | ton | 76430 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 1454886 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Tailings (sand) | ton | 110626 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Yellow phosphorus slag | ton | 10724 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Nanchang Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 68125 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Nanchang Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 66839 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Nanchang Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 134964 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 201134 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Electric furnace slag | ton | 9300 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Fly-ash | ton | 6359 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Limestone powder | ton | 25128 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Phosphogypsum | ton | 1203 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Subtotal | ton | 416225 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Lanfeng - Sulfate slag | ton | 8824 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 205569 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Electric furnace slag | ton | 27298 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 128458 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 119543 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Others | ton | 196805 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Phosphogypsum | ton | 205491 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 695244 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Sulfate slag | ton | 99942 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Sichuan Yadong - Tailings (sand) | ton | 10066 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Coal slag | ton | 7731 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 51897 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 7127 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 58595 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Others | ton | 19135 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 261742 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Coal slag | ton | 178521 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 8485 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Electric furnace slag | ton | 6652 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Fly-ash | ton | 19888 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Limestone powder | ton | 65482 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Non-ferrous metal slag | ton | 4161 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Subtotal | ton | 889262 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Wuhan Yaxin - Sulfate slag | ton | 51942 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Coal slag | ton | 19102 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 118878 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 98735 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 66295 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 379958 | 46 |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Yangzhou Yadong - Sulfate slag | ton | 76318 | 46 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial slag utilization volume Huanggang Yadong | 0000 tons | 49.4 | 46.1 | 32.2 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Hubei Yadong | 0000 tons | 153.5 | 112.3 | 93.3 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Jiangxi Yadong | 0000 tons | 134 | 169.3 | 145.5 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Nanchang Yadong | 0000 tons | 20 | 18.1 | 13.5 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Sichuan Lanfeng | 0000 tons | 66.5 | 34 | 41.6 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Sichuan Yadong | 0000 tons | 78.9 | 69.5 | 66 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Wuhan Yadong | 0000 tons | 32.4 | 26.2 | 14.8 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Wuhan Yaxin | 0000 tons | 88.9 | 86.3 | 118.4 | 47 |
| Industrial slag utilization volume Yangzhou Yadong | 0000 tons | 23.6 | 19.2 | 47 | |
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Coal slag | ton | 58447 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Converter slag | ton | 400 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 93813 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Electric furnace slag | ton | 5999 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 39062 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 165761 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Non-ferrous metal slag | ton | 15035 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Phosphogypsum | ton | 28789 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 461417 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Huanggang Yadong - Tailings (sand) | ton | 54183 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Coal slag | ton | 20086 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Converter slag | ton | 66331 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 193332 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 166383 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Fragment | ton | 56387 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 299519 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Non-ferrous metal slag | ton | 67651 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Phosphogypsum | ton | 822 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Subtotal | ton | 933313 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Hubei Yadong - Yellow phosphorus slag | ton | 8182 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Coal slag | ton | 118476 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Construction waste | ton | 652 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Converter slag | ton | 74102 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Desulfurization gypsum | ton | 410324 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Fly-ash | ton | 157814 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Fragment | ton | 401 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Limestone powder | ton | 133021 | 46 | ||
| Utilization volume of industrial slag by cement companies - Jiangxi Yadong - Non-ferrous metal slag | ton | 341 | 46 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount spent on air pollution prevention | million yuan | 49.277 | 97 |
| CO2 emission reduction by replaced and transformed equipment (Asia Cement China) | tons | 3933 | 32 |
| CO2 emissions reduced by equipment replacement/modification | tons | 3933 | 9 |
| Clinker consumption saved by 'Skyscraper' brand grinding aids (Sichuan Lan Feng) | tons | 133298 | 9 |
| Clinker consumption saved by 'Skyscraper' brand grinding aids (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 17073 | 9 |
| Clinker saved by process improvement (Sichuan Yadong) | tons | 133298 | 32 |
| Clinker saved by using 'Skyscraper' brand grinding aid (Wuhan Yadong) | tons | 17073 | 32 |
| Investment in pollution control and prevention | million RMB | 49.277 | 9 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial waste residue used | million tons | 5.45 | 9 |
| Proportion of industrial waste used in cement kilns | million tons | 5.45 | 8 |
| Solid waste co-processed in cement kilns | tons | 67888 | 8 |
| Solid waste fuel rods co-processed as alternative fuels | tons | 17518.7 | 8 |
| Solid wastes landfilled and sorted by cement kilns | tons | 24772.91 | 9 |
| Wastewater discharge standard compliance (Grade I standard, GB8978-1996) | Complies | 100 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement output (ton) | ton | 25479957 | 25196723 | 23738578 | 33 |
| Clinker output (Asia Cement China) | 0000 tons | 2480 | 2484.2 | 2390.74 | 31 |
| Clinker output, Huanggang Yadong | 10000 tons | 142.13 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Hubei Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 154.96 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Hubei Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 139.49 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 158.07 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 154.42 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #3 | 10000 tons | 161.38 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #4 | 10000 tons | 169 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #5 | 10000 tons | 249.49 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong #6 | 10000 tons | 231.18 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng #1 | 10000 tons | 154.25 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng #2 | 10000 tons | 177.93 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong #1 | 10000 tons | 138.14 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong #2 | 10000 tons | 141.46 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong #3 | 10000 tons | 144.9 | 30 | ||
| Clinker output, Wuhan Yaxin | 10000 tons | 73.94 | 30 | ||
| Electricity generated from residual heat recovery | MWh | 612005 | 9 | ||
| Energy Density (GJ/ton cement) | GJ/ton cement | 2.76 | 2.74 | 2.75 | 33 |
| Energy consumption of cement (MCAL/ton) | MCAL/ton | 658.81 | 654.29 | 657.09 | 33 |
| Proportion of residual heat power generation | % | 28.1 | 9 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water saved by recycling of wastewater (Asia Cement China) | tons | 188864 | 32 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal saved by using raw material additives (Jiangxi Yadong) | tons | 4659 | 32 |
| Electricity saved by 'Skyscraper' brand grinding aids (Sichuan Lan Feng) | million kWh | 7.617 | 9 |
| Electricity saved by equipment replacement/modification | million kWh | 6.447 | 9 |
| Electricity saved by process improvement (Jiangxi Yadong) | million kWh | 8.988 | 9 |
| Electricity saved by process improvement (Sichuan Yadong) | kWh | 7617000 | 32 |
| Electricity saved by replaced and transformed equipment (Asia Cement China) | kWh | 6447000 | 32 |
| Electricity saved by using raw material additives (Jiangxi Yadong) | kWh | 8988000 | 32 |
| Energy saving and emissions reduction Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 750 | 22 |
| Energy saving and emissions reduction Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 427.27 | 22 |
| Energy saving and emissions reduction Sichuan Yadong | RMB'000 | 1408.9 | 22 |
| Standard coal saved by incineration of solid waste | tons | 3003 | 9 |
| Standard coal saved by process improvement (Jiangxi Yadong) | tons | 4659 | 9 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of bagged cement package (recycling products and packaging materials) | percent | 11 | 76 |
| Percentage of bulk cement package (recycling products and packaging materials) | percent | 89 | 76 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Achievement of 8 disclosure items and indicators for sustainable mines | 100% | 8 | |
| Environmental projects for the mining area Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 28.68 | 22 |
| Environmental projects for the mining area Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 769.01 | 22 |
| Environmental projects for the mining area Sichuan Yadong | RMB'000 | 571.6 | 22 |
| Grass seeds planted in mines | kg | 8820 | 9 |
| Green mines investment | million RMB | 52.8605 | 97 |
| Integrated resource utilization Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 58.69 | 22 |
| Integrated resource utilization Sichuan Yadong | RMB'000 | 40.4 | 22 |
| Investment in digital technology and green mines | million RMB | 82.8605 | 9 |
| Investment in green mines under the jurisdiction of Jiangxi Yadong | RMB thousands | 52860.5 | 5 |
| Mines reclamation area | hectares | 60.9 | 9 |
| Mining development methods Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 670.68 | 22 |
| Mining development methods Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 89.16 | 22 |
| Number of green limestone mining areas at or above provincial level | 2 | 100 | |
| Saplings planted in mines | saplings | 20380 | 9 |
| Total greening area in the whole mining area | hectares | 60.9 | 100 |
| Total project investment Asia Cement (China) Investment in Green Mines | RMB'000 | 5286.05 | 22 |
| Total project investment Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 1468.6 | 22 |
| Total project investment Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 1607.95 | 22 |
| Total project investment Sichuan Yadong | RMB'000 | 2209.5 | 22 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual number of applicants in 2020 (Maternity leave, Female) | 41 | 83 | ||||
| Actual number of applicants in 2020 (Nursing leave, Male) | 145 | 83 | ||||
| Average salary increase for all employees | 22% | 79 | ||||
| Chinese native competent employee (Asia Cement China) | persons | 511 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Chengdu Yali) | persons | 4 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Huanggang Yadong) | persons | 40 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Hubei Yadong) | persons | 76 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Hubei Yali) | persons | 5 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Jiangxi Yadong) | persons | 175 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Jiangxi Yali) | persons | 12 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Nanchang Yadong) | persons | 9 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Nanchang Yali) | persons | 10 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Sichuan Lanfeng) | persons | 38 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Sichuan Yadong) | persons | 66 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Sichuan Yali 7) | persons | 6 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Sichuan Yali) | persons | 5 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Taizhou Yadong) | persons | 2 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Wuhan Yadong) | persons | 11 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Wuhan Yali) | persons | 6 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Wuhan Yaxin) | persons | 29 | 25 | |||
| Chinese native competent employee (Yangzhou Yadong) | persons | 17 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Asia Cement China) | persons | 563 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Chengdu Yali) | persons | 4 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Huanggang Yadong) | persons | 41 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Hubei Yadong) | persons | 88 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Hubei Yali) | persons | 5 | 25 | |||
| Competent employee (Jiangxi Yadong) | persons | 192 | 25 | |||
| Employee social insurance coverage rate | 100% | 79 | ||||
| Gender trends for long-term borrowed workers - Female | persons | 63 | 483 | 477 | 52 | 78 |
| Gender trends for long-term borrowed workers - Male | persons | 3434 | 3404 | 3408 | 3341 | 78 |
| Local competent employee (Asia Cement China) | persons | 270 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Chengdu Yali) | persons | 4 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Huanggang Yadong) | persons | 27 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Hubei Yadong) | persons | 74 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Hubei Yali) | persons | 3 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Jiangxi Yadong) | persons | 53 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Jiangxi Yali) | persons | 12 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Nanchang Yadong) | persons | 5 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Nanchang Yali) | persons | 9 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Sichuan Lanfeng) | persons | 21 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Sichuan Yadong) | persons | 16 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Sichuan Yali 7) | persons | 2 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Sichuan Yali) | persons | 4 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Wuhan Yadong) | persons | 10 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Wuhan Yali) | persons | 4 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Wuhan Yaxin) | persons | 18 | 25 | |||
| Local competent employee (Yangzhou Yadong) | persons | 8 | 25 | |||
| Local residents employed by factories and mines as a percentage of total workers | % | 80.4 | 100 | |||
| Number of applicants in 2020 (Maternity leave, Female) | 463 | 83 | ||||
| Number of applicants in 2020 (Maternity leave, Female, for employees still on the job after their leave in 2019) | 46 | 83 | ||||
| Number of applicants in 2020 (Nursing leave, Male) | 3341 | 83 | ||||
| Number of applicants in 2020 (Nursing leave, Male, for employees still on the job after their leave in 2019) | 208 | 83 | ||||
| Number of employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 39 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 288 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 431 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 83 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 1009 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 122 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 49 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 103 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 396 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 563 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 50 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 82 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 32 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 77 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 50 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 267 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 163 | 24 | |||
| Number of employees in English AI training | 1 | 85 | ||||
| Number of employees in English training by real foreign teachers | 1 | 85 | ||||
| Number of employees returning to work after leave in 2020 (Maternity leave, Female) | 38 | 83 | ||||
| Number of employees returning to work after leave in 2020 (Nursing leave, Male) | 144 | 83 | ||||
| Number of local employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 34 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 222 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 389 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 72 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 681 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 85 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 28 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 41 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 322 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 396 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 38 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 80 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 28 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 58 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 43 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 249 | 24 | |||
| Number of local employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 113 | 24 | |||
| Number of new female staff | persons | 6 | 79 | |||
| Number of new male staff | persons | 49 | 79 | |||
| Number of new staff 31-35 years old | persons | 23 | 79 | |||
| Number of new staff above 51 years old (including 51) | persons | 12 | 79 | |||
| Number of new staff under 30 years old (including 30) | persons | 20 | 79 | |||
| Overall employment rate | 1.4% | 79 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Asia Cement China) | 91% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Chengdu Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Huanggang Yadong) | 98% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Hubei Yadong) | 86% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Hubei Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Jiangxi Yadong) | 91% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Jiangxi Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Nanchang Yadong) | 90% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Nanchang Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Sichuan Lanfeng) | 97% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Sichuan Yadong) | 87% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Sichuan Yali 7) | 86% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Sichuan Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Taizhou Yadong) | 67% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Wuhan Yadong) | 85% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Wuhan Yali) | 86% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Wuhan Yaxin) | 94% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of competent employee who are Chinese native (Yangzhou Yadong) | 85% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Asia Cement China) | 48% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Chengdu Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Huanggang Yadong) | 66% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Hubei Yadong) | 84% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Hubei Yali) | 60% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Jiangxi Yadong) | 28% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Jiangxi Yali) | 100% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Nanchang Yadong) | 50% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Nanchang Yali) | 90% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Sichuan Lanfeng) | 54% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Sichuan Yadong) | 21% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Sichuan Yali 7) | 29% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Sichuan Yali) | 80% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Taizhou Yadong) | 0% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Wuhan Yadong) | 77% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Wuhan Yali) | 57% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Wuhan Yaxin) | 58% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local competent employee (Yangzhou Yadong) | 40% | 25 | ||||
| Percentage of local employees (all companies) | percent | 76% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Chengdu Yali | percent | 87% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Huanggang Yadong | percent | 77% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Hubei Yadong | percent | 90% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Hubei Yali | percent | 87% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Jiangxi Yadong | percent | 67% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Jiangxi Yali | percent | 70% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Nanchang Yadong | percent | 57% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Nanchang Yali | percent | 40% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | percent | 81% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Sichuan Yadong | percent | 70% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Sichuan Yali | percent | 76% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | percent | 98% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Taizhou Yadong | percent | 88% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Wuhan Yadong | percent | 75% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Wuhan Yali | percent | 86% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Wuhan Yaxin | percent | 93% | 24 | |||
| Percentage of local employees - Yangzhou Yadong | percent | 69% | 24 | |||
| Reinstatement rate (Maternity leave, Female) | 92.7% | 83 | ||||
| Reinstatement rate (Nursing leave, Male) | 99.3% | 83 | ||||
| Staff membership fees paid | million yuan | 7.5762 | 97 | |||
| Total number of employees | persons | 3887 | 79 | |||
| Total number of employees (all companies) | employees | 3804 | 24 | |||
| Total number of local employees (all companies) | employees | 2879 | 24 | |||
| Total number of new staff | persons | 55 | 79 | |||
| Total working hours (Asia Cement China) | hours | 10034640 | 89 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of employees still on the job after their leave in 2019 (Maternity leave, Female) | 40 | 83 | |
| Number of employees still on the job after their leave in 2019 (Nursing leave, Male) | 198 | 83 | |
| Number of resigned female staff | persons | 21 | 79 |
| Number of resigned male staff | persons | 117 | 79 |
| Number of resigned staff 31-35 years old | persons | 80 | 79 |
| Number of resigned staff above 51 years old (including 51) | persons | 29 | 79 |
| Number of resigned staff under 30 years old (including 30) | persons | 29 | 79 |
| Overall turnover rate | 3.6% | 79 | |
| Retention rate (Maternity leave, Female) | 87.0% | 83 | |
| Retention rate (Nursing leave, Male) | 95.2% | 83 | |
| Total number of resigned staff | persons | 138 | 79 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Yadong - Male | 1.49 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Yadong - Total | 1.35 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Subtotal | 1.49 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Total | 1.7 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 1.68 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Total | 1.43 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Male | 2.74 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Total | 2.32 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) (Asia Cement China) | 0.32 | 89 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Chengdu Yali - Female | 0.38 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Chengdu Yali - Male | 3.89 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Chengdu Yali - Total | 1.11 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 0.12 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Huanggang Yadong - Total | 0.11 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 2.88 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yadong - Total | 2.74 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yali - Male | 2.88 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Hubei Yali - Total | 2.74 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 0.04 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yadong - Total | 0.04 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 0.15 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Jiangxi Yali - Total | 0.14 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 3.8 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Nanchang Yadong - Total | 3.27 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Sichuan Yadong - Male | 0.05 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Sichuan Yadong - Total | 0.03 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Subtotal | 0.32 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Total | 0.32 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 0.19 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Wuhan Yaxin - Total | 0.06 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Yangzhou Yadong - Male | 0.19 | 92 | |
| Frequency-Severity Indicator (FSI) - Yangzhou Yadong - Total | 0.16 | 92 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters (Asia Cement China) | 15 | 89 | |
| Severity Rate (SR) (Asia Cement China) | 70.51 | 89 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absence Rate (AR) - Chengdu Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Chengdu Yali - Male | 1.111% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Huanggang Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 0.008% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Hubei Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 0.690% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Hubei Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Hubei Yali - Male | 0.690% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 0.003% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 0.005% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 1.271% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Nanchang Yali - Male | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yadong - Male | 0.073% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yali (second entry) - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yali (second entry) - Male | 0.000% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Sichuan Yali - Male | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Taizhou Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Taizhou Yadong - Male | 0.000% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yadong - Male | 0.000% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yali - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yali - Male | 0.000% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 0.036% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Female | 0.00% | 92 | |
| Absence Rate (AR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Male | 0.011% | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Chengdu Yali - Male | 11.48 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Chengdu Yali - Total | 9.71 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Huanggang Yadong - Male | 1.43 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Huanggang Yadong - Total | 1.32 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 9.59 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yadong - Total | 9.13 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yali - Male | 9.59 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Hubei Yali - Total | 9.13 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Male | 0.42 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yadong - Total | 0.38 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 3.29 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Jiangxi Yali - Total | 3.1 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Nanchang Yadong - Male | 9.24 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Nanchang Yadong - Total | 7.89 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Male | 3.55 | 92 | |
| Disabling Frequency Rate (FR) - Sichuan Lanfeng - Total | 2.87 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Chengdu Yali - Female | 3.89 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Chengdu Yali - Male | 1175.21 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yadong - Female | 2.88 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yadong - Male | 821.47 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yali - Female | 2.88 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Hubei Yali - Male | 821.47 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yali - Female | 0.04 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Jiangxi Yali - Male | 3.75 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Sichuan Yadong - Female | 0.56 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Sichuan Yadong - Male | 70.78 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Subtotal | 80.29 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Total | 70.51 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Female | 18.59 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Wuhan Yaxin - Male | 0.08 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Female | 0.19 | 92 | |
| Disabling Severity Rate (SR) - Yangzhou Yadong - Male | 11.62 | 92 | |
| Frequency Rate (FR) (Asia Cement China) | 1.49 | 89 |
Description of occupational health and safety measures adopted, and how they are implemented and monitored.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Chengdu Yali | employees | 11 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 219 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Hubei Yadong | employees | 301 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Hubei Yali | employees | 83 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 788 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 70 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 29 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Nanchang Yali | employees | 26 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 268 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 309 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Sichuan Yali | employees | 63 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 30 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 75 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Wuhan Yali | employees | 49 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 229 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Dust) - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 111 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (High temperature) - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 15 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (High temperature) - Hubei Yadong | employees | 10 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (High temperature) - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 64 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (High temperature) - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 27 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (High temperature) - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 26 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Chengdu Yali | employees | 11 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 192 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Hubei Yadong | employees | 30 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 93 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 70 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 29 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Nanchang Yali | employees | 14 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 248 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 289 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Sichuan Yali | employees | 14 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 30 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 42 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Wuhan Yali | employees | 49 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 33 | 91 |
| Number of employees in significant health-harming workplace (Noise) - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 62 | 91 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competent employee (Jiangxi Yali) | persons | 12 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Nanchang Yadong) | persons | 10 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Nanchang Yali) | persons | 10 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Sichuan Lanfeng) | persons | 39 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Sichuan Yadong) | persons | 76 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Sichuan Yali 7) | persons | 7 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Sichuan Yali) | persons | 5 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Taizhou Yadong) | persons | 3 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Wuhan Yadong) | persons | 13 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Wuhan Yali) | persons | 7 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Wuhan Yaxin) | persons | 31 | 25 |
| Competent employee (Yangzhou Yadong) | persons | 20 | 25 |
| Corporate management and image Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 7.77 | 22 |
| Corporate management and image Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 239.13 | 22 |
| Corporate management and image Sichuan Yadong | RMB'000 | 188.6 | 22 |
| Echelon completed for English AI training | 80 | 85 | |
| Echelon completed for English training by real foreign teachers | 31 | 85 | |
| Echelon completed for key personnel training | 62 | 85 | |
| Number of employees in key personnel training | 11 | 85 | |
| Number of participants in onboarding training for each subsidiary | 3776 | 85 | |
| Training costs for English AI training | RMB | 63000 | 85 |
| Training costs for English training by real foreign teachers | RMB | 145000 | 85 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expenditure for English AI training | RMB'000 | 6.3 | 85 |
| Expenditure for English training by real foreign teachers | RMB'000 | 14.5 | 85 |
| Expenditure for key personnel training | RMB'000 | 15.6 | 85 |
| Number of key personnel trained | 62 | 85 | |
| Total expenditure for major project-oriented trainings | RMB'000 | 36.4 | 85 |
| Total length of time of each person for English AI training | days | 11.25 | 85 |
| Total length of time of each person for English training by real foreign teachers | days | 11.25 | 85 |
| Total length of time of each person for key personnel training | days | 11 | 85 |
| Total number of training hours for onboarding training for each subsidiary | hours | 30502 | 85 |
| Total person training time for English training by real foreign teachers | days | 11.25 | 85 |
| Total time of English AI training | days | 11.25 | 85 |
| Total training costs for key personnel | RMB | 156000 | 85 |
Number of suppliers by geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of engineering projects completed by Huanggang Yadong | 11 | 21 | |
| Number of engineering projects completed by Jiangxi Yadong | 90 | 21 | |
| Number of engineering projects completed by Sichuan Yadong | 28 | 21 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer satisfaction score | points | 96 | 95 | 96 | 96 | 96 | 76 |
| Earnings per share (EPS) | RMB | 1.703 | 65 | ||||
| Return rate of customer satisfaction survey | 100% | 76 | |||||
| Year-on-year decrease in total sales volume of cement and clinker | % | -5.3 | 65 |
Description of practices relating to observing and protecting intellectual property rights.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technological innovation and digital mines Huanggang Yadong | RMB'000 | 11.47 | 22 |
| Technological innovation and digital mines Jiangxi Yadong | RMB'000 | 24.69 | 22 |
Focus areas of contribution (e.g. education, environmental concerns, labour needs, health, culture, sport).
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication sessions with local residents | sessions | 9 | 9 |
| Investment by Huanggang Yadong | RMB | 14686000 | 21 |
| Investment by Jiangxi Yadong | RMB | 16076900 | 21 |
| Investment by Sichuan Yadong | RMB | 22095000 | 21 |
| Investment in local social care (Asia Cement China) | RMB | 8078462.19 | 25 |
| Local residents involved in communication | residents | 75 | 9 |
| Meetings and communications among local residents | 9 | 97 | |
| Negotiation sessions with local residents (Jiangxi Yadong) | sessions | 8 | 25 |
| Negotiation sessions with local residents (Sichuan Yadong) | sessions | 1 | 25 |
| Participants in local resident meetings | 75 | 97 | |
| Participants in negotiation with local residents (Jiangxi Yadong) | persons | 57 | 25 |
| Participants in negotiation with local residents (Sichuan Yadong) | persons | 18 | 25 |
| Proposed cash dividend for the year | RMB | 0.511 | 65 |
| Social stability expenditure | million RMB | 11.87 | 9 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
| Indicator | Unit | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donated materials and funds for COVID-19 epidemic prevention | million RMB | 10 | 5 |
| Total union fees in 2020 | million RMB | 7.5762 | 83 |
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions | ton | 560.6 | 572.2 | 503.6 |
| NOâ‚“ Emissions | ton | 8604.4 | 8439 | 10033.6 |
| SOâ‚“ Emissions | ton | 1621.7 | 1583 | 935 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total GHG Emissions | tons | 21925000 | 21650000 | 20953000 | |
| Total GHG Emissions Intensity (By Product Volume) | % reduction | 0.884 | 0.872 | 0.88 | 20 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hazardous Waste Reused | 0000 tons | 647.2 | 561 | 625.3 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons | 3933 |
| GHG Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons/year | 2095.3 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption Intensity (By Product Weight) | GJ/ton cement | 2.76 | 2.74 | 2.75 |
| Energy Consumption Intensity (By Unit Product) | MCAL/ton | 658.81 | 654.29 | 657.09 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Recycled Water Usage | tons | 188864 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | kWh | 32752000 |
| Investment in Energy-saving and Emission-reduction Technology Transformation | RMB'000 | 2586.17 |
Total packaging material used for finished products (in tonnes) and, if applicable, with reference to per unit produced.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Packaging Materials Waste Recycled | percent | 89 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Investment in Ecological Restoration | RMB'000 | 5286.05 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Employees in Mainland China | employees | 3804 | |
| Number of Employees in Mainland China (Female) | persons | 463 | |
| Number of Employees in Mainland China (Male) | persons | 3341 | |
| Number of Female Employees | persons | 494 | 463 |
| Number of Male Employees | persons | 3393 | 3341 |
| Number of New Employees | persons | 55 | |
| Number of New Employees (Above 50) | persons | 12 | |
| Number of New Employees (Aged 30-50) | persons | 23 | |
| Number of New Employees (Aged Below 30) | persons | 20 | |
| Number of New Employees (Female) | persons | 6 | |
| Number of New Employees (Male) | persons | 49 | |
| Number of Temporary Workers | persons | 295 | |
| Number of Temporary Workers (Female) | persons | 243 | |
| Number of Temporary Workers (Male) | persons | 52 | |
| Number of Total Employees | employees | 3887 | 3804 |
| Percentage of Employees in Mainland China | percent | 100 | |
| Percentage of Female Employees | percent | 12.2 | |
| Percentage of Male Employees | percent | 87.8 | |
| Percentage of Temporary Workers | percent | 7.8 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Female) | persons | 40 |
| Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Male) | persons | 198 |
| Percentage of Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Female) | % | 87 |
| Percentage of Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Male) | % | 95.2 |
| Turnover Rate of Employees Aged Above 50 | % | None |
| Turnover Rate of Employees Aged Below 30 | % | None |
| Turnover Rate of Female Employees | % | None |
| Turnover Rate of Male Employees | % | None |
| Turnover Rate of Total Employees | % | 3.6 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR/LTIR) | 1.49 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Cost of Training | RMB | 208000 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Average Training Hours per Employee | hours | |
| Total Training Hours | hours | 30502 |
Number of suppliers by geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit |
|---|---|
| Number of Suppliers in Central China | |
| Number of Suppliers in Southeast China | |
| Number of Suppliers in Southwest China |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Public Welfare Donations | million RMB | 10 |
| Total Social Investment | million RMB | 10 |