2019 Corporate Social Responsibility Report
Extracted ESG KPIs
KPIs are organized by ESG aspects.
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammonia nitrogen (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 9.23 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 4.71 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1.06 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 4.7 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 4.32 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 2.5 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1 | 30 | ||
| Ammonia nitrogen (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.65 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 20 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Animal and vegetable oils (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5 | 30 | ||
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Huanggang Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 324 | 315 | 273.7 | 32 |
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Hubei Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 272 | 236 | 173.2 | 32 |
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Jiangxi Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 308.4 | 276 | 265.5 | 32 |
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Sichuan Lanfeng (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 297 | 91.5 | 32 | |
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Sichuan Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 125 | 80.2 | 136 | 32 |
| Average concentration of nitrogen oxide of Wuhan Yaxin (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | mg/m³ | 272.4 | 291 | 192 | 32 |
| Biological oxygen demand (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 18.2 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 7.5 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 11.05 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 19.4 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5.8 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 5.2 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 15 | 30 | ||
| Biological oxygen demand (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 7 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 71.5 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 38.1 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 36.25 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 92 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 39 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 18 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 50 | 30 | ||
| Chemical oxygen demand (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 32 | 30 | ||
| Denitrification operation expense | RMB' 0000 | 3075.4 | 34 | ||
| Desulfurization operation expense | RMB' 0000 | 1629.7 | 34 | ||
| Dust emission concentration, Huanggang Yadong | mg/m3 | 12.31 | 7.8 | 34 | |
| Dust emission concentration, Hubei Yadong | mg/m3 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m3 | 14.3 | 6 | 34 | |
| Dust emission concentration, Nanchang Yadong (cement grinding) | mg/m3 | 8.2 | 9.7 | 22.2 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m3 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Sichuan Yadong | mg/m3 | 8.9 | 3 | 34 | |
| Dust emission concentration, Wuhan Yadong (1# cement grinding) | mg/m3 | 8.4 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Wuhan Yadong (2# cement grinding) | mg/m3 | 8.4 | 10.3 | 6.2 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m3 | 7.43 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 34 |
| Dust emission concentration, Yangzhou Yadong (cement grinding) | mg/m3 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 6.4 | 34 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 688.6 | 601.3 | 613.6 | 31 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Hubei Yadong | ton | 1171 | 1064 | 734 | 31 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 4624 | 5447 | 5171 | 31 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 953 | 722.7 | 724.8 | 31 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 1927 | 1073 | 1662 | 31 |
| Nitrogen oxide emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 489.6 | 453.8 | 484.4 | 31 |
| Oil type (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 10 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.11 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.05 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.06 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1 | 30 | ||
| Oil type (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1 | 30 | ||
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Huanggang Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 27.6 | 39.3 | 27.7 | 32 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Hubei Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 183.6 | 90 | 85.8 | 32 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Jiangxi Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 244 | 257 | 257.4 | 32 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Sichuan Lanfeng (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 172 | 81 | 91 | 32 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Sichuan Yadong (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 160.4 | 71.4 | 78.8 | 32 |
| Particulate pollutant emissions of Wuhan Yaxin (Asia Cement China) consistent cement company | ton | 51.8 | 31.5 | 21.9 | 32 |
| Pollutants discharge fee and environmental protection tax to the government | RMB' 0000 | 3360 | 34 | ||
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 105.6 | 43 | 50.7 | 31 |
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Hubei Yadong | ton | 131.8 | 88 | 137.8 | 31 |
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 1182 | 1368 | 1273.7 | 31 |
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 85 | 53 | 80 | 31 |
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 89.6 | 49.1 | 34.5 | 31 |
| SO₂ emissions of Asia Cement (China) - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 8 | 19.6 | 6.3 | 31 |
| Soot emission concentration, Huanggang Yadong | mg/m3 | 15.25 | 8.38 | 7.2 | 34 |
| Soot emission concentration, Hubei Yadong | mg/m3 | 13 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 34 |
| Soot emission concentration, Jiangxi Yadong | mg/m3 | 9.1 | 16.9 | 9 | 34 |
| Soot emission concentration, Sichuan Lanfeng | mg/m3 | 2.9 | 9 | 8 | 34 |
| Soot emission concentration, Sichuan Yadong | mg/m3 | 17.3 | 3.34 | 34 | |
| Soot emission concentration, Wuhan Yaxin | mg/m3 | 7.43 | 4.65 | 6.3 | 34 |
| Total phosphorus (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 1.03 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.28 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.54 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.12 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.36 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.5 | 30 | ||
| Total phosphorus (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 0.59 | 30 | ||
| pH (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.74 | 30 | |||
| pH (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.69 | 30 | |||
| pH (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.42 | 30 | |||
| pH (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.63 | 30 | |||
| pH (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | 7.44 | 30 | |||
| pH (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.04 | 30 | |||
| pH (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.45 | 30 | |||
| pH (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | 7.16 | 30 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Emission Intensity of GHG (CO2) in Asia Cement (China) | t CO2/t clinker | 0.859 | 0.884 | 0.872 | 0.889 | 23 |
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Huanggang Yadong | 0.904 | 0.934 | 0.934 | 24 | ||
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Hubei Yadong | 0.865 | 0.844 | 0.824 | 24 | ||
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Jiangxi Yadong | 0.856 | 0.87 | 0.863 | 24 | ||
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Sichuan Lanfeng | 0.875 | 0.875 | 0.871 | 24 | ||
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Sichuan Yadong | 0.873 | 0.875 | 0.875 | 24 | ||
| Emission Performance of GHG (CO2) of Clinker Products, Wuhan Yaxin | 0.841 | 0.933 | 0.938 | 24 | ||
| GHG emission intensity | 0.872 | 8 | ||||
| Total emission of CO2 in Asia Cement (China) | thousand tons | 2076.8 | 2192.5 | 2165 | 23 | |
| Total emission of CO2, Huanggang Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 150.34 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 150.78 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Hubei Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 116.08 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 146.45 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 153.44 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 3# | 0000 tons | 150.38 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 4# | 0000 tons | 158.7 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 5# | 0000 tons | 219.35 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Jiangxi Yadong 6# | 0000 tons | 211.32 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng 1# | 0000 tons | 122.72 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Lanfeng 2# | 0000 tons | 144.38 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 81.39 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 140.79 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Sichuan Yadong 3# | 0000 tons | 133.85 | 24 | |||
| Total emission of CO2, Wuhan Yaxin 1# | 0000 tons | 85 | 24 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel rods produced from solid waste | tons | 6320.86 | 8 |
| Suspended solids (Huanggang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 15 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Hubei Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 59.5 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Jiangxi Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 16 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Nanchang Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 23 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Sichuan Lafeng, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 14.2 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Sichuan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 13 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Wuhan Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 18 | 30 |
| Suspended solids (Yangzhou Yadong, average value of measurement) | mg/L | 17.5 | 30 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 15142 | 31818 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Nanchang Yadong | ton | 2935 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 14302 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 10046 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 78688 | 86088 | 14113 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 1265 | 42358 | 51942 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Others - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 34337 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Others - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 300052 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Others - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 177102 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 30591 | 16938 | 28789 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Hubei Yadong | ton | 23260 | 7174 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 35507 | 24428 | 12132 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 175254 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 207593 | 82474 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Phosphogypsum - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 4769 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 410445 | 494013 | 461417 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Hubei Yadong | ton | 1878638 | 1535549 | 1122467 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 1361591 | 1340258 | 1693108 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Nanchang Yadong | ton | 172038 | 180767 | 200347 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 655097 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 741537 | 788984 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 486968 | 324409 | 611374 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 76916 | 862590 | 889262 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Subtotal - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 455396 | 379958 | 236371 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Sulfate slag - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 293 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Sulfate slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 77163 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Sulfate slag - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 101848 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Sulfate slag - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 93604 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Tailings (sand) - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 54183 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Tailings (sand) - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 499253 | 641868 | 612982 | 37 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 emission reduction equivalent from energy saving measures | tons/year | 23300 | 25 |
| Investment in pollution control and prevention | million RMB | 203.349 | 8 |
Description of how hazardous and non-hazardous wastes are handled, and a description of reduction target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 57739 | 59446 | 58437 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Hubei Yadong | ton | 1057180 | 744046 | 404204 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 127480 | 134071 | 115898 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 12060 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 145719 | 18872 | 77031 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 6779 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Coal slag - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 43990 | 21158 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 73123 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Hubei Yadong | ton | 64756 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 49845 | 58152 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 3572 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 7872 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Construction waste - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 32882 | 7172 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Converter slag - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 19759 | 15451 | 400 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Converter slag - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 201020 | 36293 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Converter slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 18253 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 76532 | 107959 | 93813 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Hubei Yadong | ton | 183363 | 237906 | 219320 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 356600 | 394643 | 422395 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 6053 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 205550 | 201408 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 9114 | 4167 | 5188 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 5108 | 65842 | 79485 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Desulfurization gypsum - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 131650 | 118878 | 115060 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 5999 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Hubei Yadong | ton | 161340 | 125613 | 123881 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 18182 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 196805 | 40782 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 4008 | 49594 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Electric furnace slag - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 76318 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 54508 | 45004 | 39902 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Hubei Yadong | ton | 409073 | 356614 | 253679 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 126589 | 95403 | 69534 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Nanchang Yadong | ton | 66493 | 86476 | 100969 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 23194 | 23422 | 7612 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 8134 | 19188 | 25515 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Fly-ash - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 150030 | 98735 | 86763 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 171516 | 176092 | 165761 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Jiangxi Yadong | ton | 333431 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Nanchang Yadong | ton | 105545 | 91351 | 39373 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Sichuan Lanfeng | ton | 81272 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Sichuan Yadong | ton | 119543 | 128458 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Wuhan Yadong | ton | 106984 | 168989 | 58595 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Wuhan Yaxin | ton | 735121 | 69950 | 37 | |
| Industrial slag utilization - Limestone powder - Yangzhou Yadong | ton | 75726 | 106925 | 13390 | 37 |
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Huanggang Yadong | ton | 15063 | 37 | ||
| Industrial slag utilization - Non-ferrous metal slag - Hubei Yadong | ton | 44422 | 52706 | 56807 | 37 |
| Industrial waste residue used | million tons | 6.73 | 8 | ||
| Operation expense for dust collectors | RMB' 0000 | 10758.8 | 34 | ||
| Solid wastes landfilled and sorted by cement kilns | tons | 26691.96 | 8 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement output of Asia Cement (China)'s consistent cement companies | ton | 24081816 | 25479957 | 25196723 | 26 | |
| Clinker output in Asia Cement (China) | thousand tons | 2416.6 | 2480 | 2484.2 | 2165 | 23 |
| Clinker output, Huanggang Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 160.95 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Hubei Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 182.44 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Hubei Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 141.57 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 167.26 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 175.82 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 3# | 0000 tons | 171.97 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 4# | 0000 tons | 181.47 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 5# | 0000 tons | 253.82 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Jiangxi Yadong 6# | 0000 tons | 244.24 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng 1# | 0000 tons | 139.55 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Lanfeng 2# | 0000 tons | 167.05 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong 1# | 0000 tons | 92.21 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong 2# | 0000 tons | 160.3 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Sichuan Yadong 3# | 0000 tons | 154.46 | 24 | |||
| Clinker output, Wuhan Yaxin 1# | 0000 tons | 91.1 | 24 | |||
| Electricity generated from residual heat recovery | MWh | 742330 | 8 | |||
| Energy consumption of cement (MCAL/ton) | MCAL/ton | 661.45 | 658.81 | 654.29 | 26 | |
| Energy density (GJ/ton cement) | GJ/ton cement | 2.77 | 2.75 | 2.74 | 26 | |
| Increase in clinker production by mixing yellow phosphorus slag into raw materials (Hubei Yadong) | tons/day | 200 | 25 | |||
| Increase in electricity generated from residual heat recovery compared to 2018 | kWh | 1000000 | 8 | |||
| Power consumption of plant | MWh | 2231646 | 2152891 | 2820762 | 27 | |
| Proportion of residual heat power generation | % | 26.32 | 8 | |||
| Proportion of waste heat power generation | % | 27.99 | 29.55 | 26.32 | 27 | |
| Waste heat recovery net power generation | MWh | 624618 | 636198 | 742330 | 27 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water saved by recycling wastewater by various cement products companies | tons/year | 62000 | 25 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coal saved by improved equipment and technology | tons per year | 6900 | 8 |
| Coal saved by replacing and transforming equipment and optimizing production processes | tons/year | 6900 | 25 |
| Coal saved by using raw material additives (Hubei Yadong) | tons/day | 3 | 25 |
| Coal saved by using raw material additives (Jiangxi Yadong) | tons/year | 6627 | 25 |
| Electricity saved by improved equipment and technology | million kWh per year | 14.33 | 8 |
| Electricity saved by replacing and transforming equipment and optimizing production processes | kWh/year | 14330000 | 25 |
| Electricity saved by using raw material additives (Hubei Yadong) | kWh/day | 2540 | 25 |
| Electricity saved by using raw material additives (Jiangxi Yadong) | kWh/year | 3700000 | 25 |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grass seeds planted in mines | kg | 9230 | 8 |
| Investment in digital technology and green mines | million RMB | 65.95 | 8 |
| Mines reclamation area | hectares | 60.9 | 8 |
| Saplings planted in mines | saplings | 28230 | 8 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender trends for long-term borrowed workers (female) | persons | 501 | 495 | 483 | 477 | 61 |
| Gender trends for long-term borrowed workers (male) | persons | 296 | 255 | 210 | 3410 | 61 |
| Huanggang Yadong employment rate | % | 4.2 | 62 | |||
| Hubei Yadong employment rate | % | 5 | 62 | |||
| Hubei Yali employment rate | % | 7.1 | 62 | |||
| Local employees - All companies | employees | 2754 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 36 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 224 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 290 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 72 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 685 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 88 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 25 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 37 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 326 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 390 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 32 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 83 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 26 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 49 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 34 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 237 | 18 | |||
| Local employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 120 | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - All companies | percent | 71% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Chengdu Yali | percent | 84% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Huanggang Yadong | percent | 78% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Hubei Yadong | percent | 67% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Hubei Yali | percent | 80% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Jiangxi Yadong | percent | 67% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Jiangxi Yali | percent | 70% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Nanchang Yadong | percent | 51% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Nanchang Yali | percent | 36% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Lanfeng | percent | 80% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yadong | percent | 67% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yali | percent | 62% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | percent | 99% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Taizhou Yadong | percent | 81% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yadong | percent | 64% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yali | percent | 68% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Wuhan Yaxin | percent | 85% | 18 | |||
| Local employees percentage - Yangzhou Yadong | percent | 71% | 18 | |||
| Nanchang Yadong employment rate | % | 2 | 62 | |||
| Number of employees with demerit | employees | 16 | 68 | |||
| Number of employees with merit | employees | 1 | 68 | |||
| Number of employees with reprimand | employees | 65 | 68 | |||
| Number of employees with reward | employees | 299 | 68 | |||
| Number of new employees aged 31–35 years old | persons | 76 | 62 | |||
| Number of new employees under 30 years old (including 30) | persons | 138 | 62 | |||
| Number of new female employees | persons | 178 | 62 | |||
| Number of new male employees | persons | 196 | 62 | |||
| Operating revenue | RMB'000 | 7815527 | 11330347 | 12608716 | 55 | |
| Overall employment rate | % | 5.5 | 62 | |||
| Return on equity rights and interests | % | 1.6 | 6.4 | 22.1 | 23.9 | 55 |
| Sichuan Lanfeng employment rate | % | 1 | 62 | |||
| Sichuan Yadong employment rate | % | 5.3 | 62 | |||
| Sichuan Yali (second entry) employment rate | % | 1 | 62 | |||
| Sichuan Yali employment rate | % | 12.5 | 62 | |||
| Surplus per share | RMB | 0.384 | 1.545 | 2.009 | 55 | |
| Total assets | RMB'000 | 16409897 | 20722246 | 23985754 | 55 | |
| Total employees - All companies | employees | 3885 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Chengdu Yali | employees | 43 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Huanggang Yadong | employees | 289 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Hubei Yadong | employees | 435 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Hubei Yali | employees | 90 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Jiangxi Yadong | employees | 1022 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Jiangxi Yali | employees | 125 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Nanchang Yadong | employees | 49 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Nanchang Yali | employees | 103 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Lanfeng | employees | 405 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yadong | employees | 583 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yali | employees | 52 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | employees | 84 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Taizhou Yadong | employees | 32 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yadong | employees | 77 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yali | employees | 50 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Wuhan Yaxin | employees | 278 | 18 | |||
| Total employees - Yangzhou Yadong | employees | 168 | 18 | |||
| Total liabilities | RMB'000 | 6199603 | 8280000 | 9342760 | 55 | |
| Total number of employees | persons | 3873 | 62 | |||
| Total number of new female staff | persons | 18 | 62 | |||
| Total number of new male staff | persons | 196 | 62 | |||
| Total working hours - Chengdu Yali | hours | 110880 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Huanggang Yadong | hours | 752400 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Hubei Yadong | hours | 1148400 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Hubei Yali | hours | 126720 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Jiangxi Yadong | hours | 2698080 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Jiangxi Yali | hours | 330000 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Nanchang Yadong | hours | 129360 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Nanchang Yali | hours | 269280 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Lanfeng | hours | 281280 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Yadong | hours | 1525920 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Yali | hours | 137280 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | hours | 221760 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Taizhou Yadong | hours | 84480 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Total | hours | 10219440 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yadong | hours | 203280 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yali | hours | 120000 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Wuhan Yaxin | hours | 733920 | 71 | |||
| Total working hours - Yangzhou Yadong | hours | 438240 | 71 | |||
| Yangzhou Yadong employment rate | % | 6.1 | 62 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR (Absence Rate) - Hubei Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.00% | 74 | |||
| AR (Absence Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.02% | 74 | |||
| AR (Absence Rate) - Nanchang Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.58% | 74 | |||
| AR (Absence Rate) - Sichuan Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.00% | 74 | |||
| AR (Absence Rate) - Wuhan Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.00% | 74 | |||
| AR (Absence Rate) - Yangzhou Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.54% | 74 | |||
| Chengdu Yali employment rate | % | 15.4 | 62 | ||
| Chengdu Yali turnover rate | % | 10.3 | 62 | ||
| Huanggang Yadong turnover rate | % | 3.1 | 62 | ||
| Hubei Yadong turnover rate | % | 3 | 62 | ||
| Hubei Yali turnover rate | % | 16.2 | 62 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong employment rate | % | 4.2 | 62 | ||
| Jiangxi Yadong turnover rate | % | 4.8 | 62 | ||
| Jiangxi Yali employment rate | % | 4.9 | 62 | ||
| Jiangxi Yali turnover rate | % | 3.3 | 62 | ||
| Nanchang Yadong turnover rate | % | 4 | 62 | ||
| Number of resigned employees above 51 years old (including 51) | persons | 13 | 62 | ||
| Number of resigned employees aged 31–35 years old | persons | 74 | 62 | ||
| Number of resigned employees under 30 years old (including 30) | persons | 113 | 62 | ||
| Number of resigned female employees | persons | 22 | 62 | ||
| Number of resigned male employees | persons | 18 | 62 | ||
| Operating gross profit | RMB'000 | 1910344 | 4386415 | 5319126 | 55 |
| Overall turnover rate | % | 5.2 | 62 | ||
| Sichuan Lanfeng turnover rate | % | 3.1 | 62 | ||
| Sichuan Yadong turnover rate | % | 4.1 | 62 | ||
| Sichuan Yali (second entry) turnover rate | % | 5.1 | 62 | ||
| Sichuan Yali turnover rate | % | 4.2 | 62 | ||
| Taizhou Yadong employment rate | % | 25.8 | 62 | ||
| Taizhou Yadong turnover rate | % | 6.5 | 62 | ||
| Total number of resigned female staff | persons | 22 | 62 | ||
| Total number of resigned male staff | persons | 180 | 62 | ||
| Wuhan Yadong turnover rate | % | 4.9 | 62 | ||
| Wuhan Yali employment rate | % | 5.2 | 62 | ||
| Wuhan Yali turnover rate | % | 19 | 62 | ||
| Wuhan Yaxin turnover rate | % | 3.5 | 62 | ||
| Yangzhou Yadong turnover rate | % | 3.7 | 62 |
Number and rate of work-related fatalities occurred in each of the past three years including the reporting year.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 2.81 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Sichuan Yadong | 5.9 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Sichuan Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 9.01 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | 9.01 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Total | 3.03 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Total (2019) | 0.34 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Total (Laborers of Contractors) | 3.03 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Wuhan Yadong | 9.83 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Wuhan Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 9.83 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Yangzhou Yadong | 4.56 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Yangzhou Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 4.56 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | 0.57 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total | 0.47 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total (2019) | 0.12 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Total (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.47 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Wuhan Yadong | 1.37 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Wuhan Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 1.37 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Yangzhou Yadong | 0.92 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Yangzhou Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 3.92 | 74 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Huanggang Yadong | 1 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Hubei Yadong | 4 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Hubei Yali | 1 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Jiangxi Yadong | 4 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Nanchang Yali | 5 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Lanfeng | 1 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Yadong | 3 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | 2 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Total | 31 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Wuhan Yadong | 2 | 71 | |
| Ordinary occupational disasters - Yangzhou Yadong | 2 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Chengdu Yali | 1515 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 74 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Hubei Yadong | 366 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Hubei Yali | 55 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Hubei Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 55 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 22 | 71, 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 22 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Nanchang Yali | 1125 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Nanchang Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 1125 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 117 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Sichuan Yadong | 9 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Sichuan Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 36 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Sichuan Yali (second entry) | 36 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Total | 72 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Total (2019) | 44 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Total (Laborers of Contractors) | 72 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Wuhan Yadong | 192 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Wuhan Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 192 | 74 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Yangzhou Yadong | 185 | 71 | |
| SR (Severity Rate) - Yangzhou Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 685 | 74 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Chengdu Yali | 75.76 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Huanggang Yadong | 1.33 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Hubei Yadong | 3.48 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Hubei Yali | 12.62 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Hubei Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 12.62 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong | 0.38 | 71, 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Jiangxi Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 1.48 | 74 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Nanchang Yali | 18.56 | 71 | |
| FR (Frequency Rate) - Nanchang Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 18.56 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Chengdu Yali | 10.71 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Huanggang Yadong | 0.31 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Hubei Yadong | 0.35 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Hubei Yali | 0.55 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Hubei Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.83 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Jiangxi Yadong | 0.16 | 71, 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Jiangxi Yadong (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.18 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Nanchang Yali | 4.56 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Nanchang Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 3.45 | 74 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Sichuan Lanfeng | 0.57 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Sichuan Yadong | 0.17 | 71 | |
| FSI (Frequency-Severity Indicator) - Sichuan Yali (Laborers of Contractors) | 0.57 | 74 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of echelons completed for Elite class training | 46 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for Key personnel training | 63 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for MTP | 47 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for QCC training | 436 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for TWI | 259 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for new comers training | 165 | 67 | |
| Number of echelons completed for participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan | 41 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for Elite class training | 63 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for Key personnel training | 41 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for MTP | 47 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for QCC training | 880 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for TWI | 264 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for new comers training | 482 | 67 | |
| Number of employees for participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan | 47 | 67 | |
| Number of employees rewarded | employees | 299 | 68 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expenditure for Elite class training | RMB'000 | 7.6 | 67 |
| Expenditure for Key personnel training | RMB'000 | 8.4 | 67 |
| Expenditure for MTP | RMB'000 | 31.1 | 67 |
| Expenditure for QCC training | RMB'000 | 23.7 | 67 |
| Expenditure for TWI | RMB'000 | 24.7 | 67 |
| Expenditure for new comers training | RMB'000 | 48.8 | 67 |
| Expenditure for participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan | RMB'000 | 31.1 | 67 |
| Total expenditure for major project-oriented trainings | RMB'000 | 271.8 | 67 |
| Total length of time for Elite class training | day | 7.6 | 67 |
| Total length of time for Key personnel training | day | 8.4 | 67 |
| Total length of time for MTP | day | 31.1 | 67 |
| Total length of time for QCC training | day | 23.7 | 67 |
| Total length of time for TWI | day | 24.7 | 67 |
| Total length of time for new comers training | day | 18.4 | 67 |
| Total length of time for participation in the Group's joint meeting in Taiwan | day | 31.1 | 67 |
Number of products and service related complaints received and how they are dealt with.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax expenses | RMB'000 | 348627 | 882360 | 1119984 | 55 |
| Non-operational balance | RMB'000 | -251504 | -240915 | -93083 | 55 |
Number of concluded legal cases regarding corrupt practices brought against the issuer or its employees during the reporting period and the outcomes of the cases.
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other operation expense for prevention and control measures | RMB' 0000 | 1511 | 34 |
| Settlement of production disputes between plants and mines - number of participants | participants | 60 | 19 |
| Settlement of production disputes between plants and mines - number of sessions | sessions | 18 | 19 |
Focus areas of contribution (e.g. education, environmental concerns, labour needs, health, culture, sport).
| Indicator | Unit | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory visits by local party member representatives - number of participants | participants | 80 | 19 |
| Factory visits by local party member representatives - number of sessions | sessions | 3 | 19 |
| Local resident communication sessions | sessions | 21 | 8 |
| Local residents involved in communication | residents | 140 | 8 |
| Social stability expenditure | million RMB | 1.67 | 8 |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
| Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Report Pages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investment in community care and beautification | RMB'000 | 1446.492 | 19 | ||
| Operating costs | RMB'000 | 5905183 | 6943932 | 7289590 | 55 |
| Total equity | RMB'000 | 10210384 | 12442346 | 14642994 | 55 |
The types of emissions and respective emissions data.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions | ton | 839.4 | 570.2 | 562.6 |
| NOₓ Emissions | ton | 9853.6 | 9361.8 | 9390.8 |
| SOₓ Emissions | ton | 1592 | 1621.7 | 1583 |
Direct (Scope 1) and energy indirect (Scope 2) greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total GHG Emissions | kg | 2076800 | 2192500 | 2165000 | |
| Total GHG Emissions Intensity (By Product Volume) | t CO2/t clinker | 0.859 | 0.884 | 0.872 | 0.889 |
Total hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Hazardous Waste (Solid Waste) | tons | 6320.86 |
Total non-hazardous waste produced (in tonnes) and, where appropriate, intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Hazardous Waste Recycled | ton | 4540296 | 5070472 | 6272527 |
Description of emissions target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons/year | 23300 |
Direct and/or indirect energy consumption by type (e.g. electricity, gas or oil) in total (kWh in '000s) and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption Intensity (By Unit Product) | GJ/ton cement | 2.77 | 2.75 | 2.74 |
Water consumption in total and intensity (e.g. per unit of production volume, per facility).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Recycled Water Usage | tons/year | 62000 |
Description of energy use efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity Usage Reduction Compared to Last Year | kWh/year | 14330000 |
Description of whether there is any issue in sourcing water that is fit for purpose, water efficiency target(s) set and steps taken to achieve them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit |
|---|---|
| Water Consumption Reduction Compared to Last Year | tons |
Description of the significant impacts of activities on the environment and natural resources and the actions taken to manage them.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Investment in Ecological Restoration | million RMB | 65.95 |
Total workforce by gender, employment type (for example, full- or part-time), age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Female Employees | persons | 501 | 495 | 483 | 477 |
| Number of Male Employees | persons | 3703 | 3434 | 3404 | 3410 |
| Number of New Employees | persons | 374 | |||
| Number of New Employees (Aged 30-50) | persons | 76 | |||
| Number of New Employees (Aged Below 30) | persons | 138 | |||
| Number of New Employees (Female) | persons | 178 | None | ||
| Number of New Employees (Male) | persons | 196 | None | ||
| Number of Total Employees | employees | 3873 | 3885 | ||
| Percentage of Female Employees | % | 12.3 | |||
| Percentage of Male Employees | % | 87.8 |
Employee turnover rate by gender, age group and geographical region.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Female) | persons | |
| Percentage of Employees still Employed 12 Months after Return to Work (Female) | % | |
| Turnover Rate of Total Employees | % | 5.2 |
Lost days due to work injury.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (Contractor) | 1.48 | |
| Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (Employees) | 75.76 |
The percentage of employees trained by gender and employee category (e.g. senior management, middle management).
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Employees Trained | % | 100 |
The average training hours completed per employee by gender and employee category.
| Standard Indicator | Unit |
|---|---|
| Total Training Hours | Hours |
Resources contributed (e.g. money or time) to the focus area.
| Standard Indicator | Unit | 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Social Investment | RMB'000 | 1446.492 |